I think p = 80 because
10% of 80 = 8
8 x 5 years = 40$
Rodney King case illuminate the differences between how black and white Americans saw the police and the justice system is explained.
<h3>What was Rodney King case?</h3>
The Rodney King case illustration, that the police profit from a double standard when defining illegal activity, which causes minorities to have a negative perception of the police.
Some key feature of this case are-
- As the Los Angeles riots that followed the acquittal of the white police officers accused of beating the black motorist showed, this cynicism can lead to civil unrest.
- Only the serious possibility of criminal prosecution will have an influence on police wrongdoing because civil lawsuits and civilian review boards have failed to stop police brutality.
- The existing situation, in which almost all prosecutors choose not to launch a meaningful challenge to widespread police brutality, may be improved with citizen access to a grand jury.
To know more about the challenges faced by minorities (African Americans) in U.S, here
brainly.com/question/4378535
#SPJ4
Answer:
This best illustrates: plasticity.
Explanation:
Our brains possess the amazing ability to change and adapt when we learn something, or even to find new paths and connections when they suffer some type of damage. That ability is called neuroplasticy, or simply plasticity.
When our brains find new paths or move functions from an area that is damaged to an undamaged area, that is called functional plasticity. <u>The type of plasticity described in the question, concerning the pianists, is called structural plasticity. It means the pianists' brains actually changed their structure as a result from learning and practicing to play the piano. Their auditory cortex is larger than what it would be in other people due to their learning.</u>
Answer:
D
Explanation:
im just here to verify it but credits to answer above
Answer:
<h3>Debate over representation when creating the constitution.</h3>
Explanation:
When the Constitution was being revised during the Convention of Philadelphia, 1787, the main debate that occurred was on the issue of representation. The larger states favored representation according to the size and population of the states while the smaller states demanded for equal representation of states regardless of size and population.
This debate led to the outcome of two agreements among the delegates. Firstly, there would be two national houses of legislature in the Congress - The House of the Representatives and The Senate respectively. Secondly, the number of representatives on the House of Representatives would be proportionate to the size and population of each state while the number of representatives in the Senate would be equal for every state.
The issue was solved through a resolution called the Great Compromise.
