The US social welfare system differs markedly from those of western European democracies, a situation that is attributable in large part to America's group of:<u> cultural </u><u>emphasis on</u><u> individualism, </u><u>and federal system of government</u>.
Unlike the American government, European democracies redistribute income among their citizens on a much larger scale. Social and cultural programmes in Europe are more generous and benefit more people. The tax regimes in Europe are more progressive. European laws aimed at defending the underprivileged are more generous.
In the United States, the distribution of before-tax income is more skewed and has a greater volatility. There is no proof that taxes in Europe result in decreased deadweight losses. Additionally, income volatility seems to be less erratic in Europe than it is in the US. However, there's a probability that middle-class households in the US have a higher likelihood of advancing up the income scale, which may make the average voter less in favour of redistribution.
To learn more about European social democracies, refer
brainly.com/question/13824231
#SPJ4
The land forms affect where people live because many people live on plains because its easy to travel and to farm on flat land. Other people live in valleys, which are the land between mountains or hills. The soil in valleys is good for farming.
Answer:
1.Interdependancy
2.Imaginative
Explanation:
1.Since you are the president everyone wants you to make accurate decisions and if you fail they criticise you.
2.For you to lead a country you need to have an imaginative view of where the country is headed to or else you'll find your self stuck.
John Q. Adams was supported by a coalition of the old Federalist residue of his father, upper class Southerners and in general, those who were anti-Jackson. His supporters formed the Whig Party by the time he ran a second time.
Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>
Explanation:
In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.
This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
