Answer:
Debra Medina claimed that nullification was possible by state laws that could neutralize federal laws. She based her claim on the 10th Amendment, which establishes that any power not constitutionally granted to the federal government can be held by the states.
Explanation:
The Constitution doesn´t enable the nullification of federal laws by the states, and several academics have stated that it could be illegal since the Supremacy Clause pronounces federal laws as the supreme national law. So nullification would overthrow the constitutional interpretation held for 200 years.
Let us also remember that Gov. Rick Perry, who supported nullification, had already skipped the nullification issue by starting a debate about secession. This debate is a reminder of the time when state rejection of racial integration had to be stopped by the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.
Answer:
popular because that's what we need right now in are country
A sociological theory by Goffman states that in places like boot camps and prisons, resocialization occurs. These places are termed total institutions. <span>Total institutions exert total control over the lives of people who live there. The places try to eliminate the individual identity and subject them to harsh treatment.</span>
The answer to the question is: the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981. It is known as ERTA or Kemp-Roth Tax Cut. It encourages economic growth though reducing individual tax rates by twenty-five percent, the charging of depreciable properties, incentives from businesses and other incentives.
After the Peace of Augsburg, Christianity was officially recognized in many German states. This meant that although was lots of divisive feelings about which schism, both Christianity and Lutheranism were accepted as official religions for the people of Germany. The goal was that there should be religious unity in each state, but some people of high ranks were exempt from this provision.
