All categories

2 years ago

13

Business

1 answer:

yan [13]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

13. Charlie would be excluded for cause;

14. the plaintiff provides proof only up to the level of “clear and convincing,” Casey can still be acquitted.

Explanation:

Since it was realised that Charlie has a relationship with on of the parties summoned for a case, this will lead to Charlie been removed and excluded for cause. This is because it is believed that due to the fact that he has a relationship with the person, there may be bias which may lead to a false outcome regarding the case.

For the second question, Cash can be acquitted if there's proof which is provided by the plaintiff and the proof is clear enough and convincing.

You might be interested in

Caroline is an artist. She purchases canvas, paints, brushes, and accessories for $75. She sells orn of her original paintings t

liberstina [14]

Answer:

Value added to the gallery will be $3000

So option (C) will be correct answer

Explanation:

We have given that Caroline sells her original painting for $1500 to an art gallery.

And after that her painting was sold to an art lover at cost of $4500

We have to find the value added to the gallery

Value added to the gallery will be equal to difference of price sold to the art lover and cost at which painting is sold to art gallery

So value added to gallery = $4500 - $1500 = $3000

So option (C) will be correct answer

4 0

3 years ago

If an agent injures a third party during the course of employment, to what extent should the employer be held liable? Under what

postnew [5]

Answer:

The employer will be held liable.

Explanation:

If the external agent brings harm or injury to a third party in the course of an employment, the employer is held liable. When a principal directs an agent to commit for a tort or if the principal is aware of the consequences of carrying the instructions of the agent could cause harm or injure the person, then the principal is liable.

It is called direct liability.

The liability for the intentional tort which is imputed to the principal when the agent acts to further the business of the principal.

The agent is personally liable under the following circumstances :

Foreign principal
Agent signs the contract in his own name
Non-existent principal
Principal cannot be sued:
Undisclosed principal

Example :

A credit card company hires a sales person and offers a company van to make sales in that area. The sales person uses the office van to official purposes. But one night, he drove the car to a friend's party and while coming he drove over a pedestrian. In this case, the owner of the company will not be held liable as the sales person uses the company van for his personal use while going out for party with his friends. While causing the accident, the sales person was not not using the office van for official purposes and was not tendering official duties at that time.

3 0

3 years ago

Partner Industries sells a single product for $50 that has a variable cost of $30. Fixed costs amount to $5 per unit when antici

Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

b. $20.

Explanation:

Regardless of what the break-even volume is, at this volume profits are zero.

This means that any unit sold beyond this point will provide a profit equivalent to its marginal benefit, which is its selling price subtracted by its variable cost.

If a product sells for $50 and has a variable cost of $30, by selling one unit in excess of its break-even volume, the profit will be:

$P= \$50-\$30 =\$20$

The profit will be $20.

8 0

3 years ago

A company wants to have $20,000 at the end of a ten-year period by investing a single sum now. How much needs to be invested in

SSSSS [86.1K]

Answer:

8448.22

Explanation:

We are asked to calculate the present value of 20,000 in ten years.

$\frac{amount}{ {(1 + rate)}^{time} } = present \: value$

$\frac{20000}{ {(1 + 0.12)}^{10} } = 8448.22$

<em>Resuming: </em>in this kind of problems we are asked for which lump sum becomes a certain amount in a given period of time at an annual rate

3 0

3 years ago

When engaged to compile the financial statements of a nonissuer, an accountant should possess a level of knowledge of the entity

NeTakaya

Answer:

C. Stated qualifications of the entity's accounting personnel

Explanation:

According to my research of the steps that are usually taken when compiling the financial statements of a non-issuer, it can be said that the accountant should know the stated qualifications of the entity's accounting personnel. This is because they should know what the qualification are of the accountant that initially made all the financial statements to see if they actually knew what they were doing.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.

7 0

3 years ago