Answer:
brand dilution
Explanation:
According to the information in the question above, it is correct to say that Ferrari may run the risk of diluting the brand, which occurs when a brand has a very strong product, as in the case of Ferrari, which is a brand recognized for its luxury cars , and betting on a licensing strategy can lead to a loss of value because other product lines do not meet the quality and value standards perceived by consumers.
Answer:
Preferred stock holders' dividend = $280000
Common stock holders' dividend = $8000
Explanation:
A cumulative preferred stock is one whose dividends are accumulated in arrears and are to paid in the following year(s), if the company fails to pay or partially pay the dividends in a certain year. The yearly dividend on preferred stock is,
Preferred stock dividend = 10000 * 200 * 0.07 = $140000
As the dividends on preferred stock are in arrears for one year, the company will pay a dividend this year on preferred stock of,
Preferred stock dividend to be paid = 140000 + 140000 = $280000
Thus, out of the announced dividend of $288000, $280000 will be paid to the preferred stock holders while the remaining $8000 will be paid to the common stock holders.
Answer:
having the power to make laws
Explanation:
Answer:
c. II and IV are governmental; I and III are not.
Explanation:
A government agency is usually a permanent organization established by either a state or national government in a federal system. They are established by legislative or executive powers for oversight and administration of specific functions. Examples of government agencies are Food and Drugs Administration (FDA), Consumer Product Safety Commission, Intelligence, Finance and Communications agency.
Non-governmental agency usually referred to as NGOs is a non-profit.
Of the four consumer protection groups listed above, Consumer Product Safety Commission and Food and Drug Administration are governmental; Better Business Bureau and Consumers Union are not.
Answer:
<em>Disparate-impact discrimination</em>
Explanation:
As we can see in the given scenario, that Nell believes that the test has an unintentionally discriminatory effect as he fails in the test taken by the company, so this discriminating act that was made by the Origami Paper Corporation is a <u>disparate-impact discrimination</u>.
<em>Because as we know that if someone is been discriminated unintentionally, then it comes under disparate-impact discrimination.</em>
