Answer: 0.050
Explanation:
Mean = 18
USL = 18.6
LSL = 17.4
SD = 1.25
Cpk = Min{(mean - LSL / 3*sd), (USL - mean / 3*sd)}
= Min{ ( 18 - 17.4/ 3 * 1.25), (18.6 - 18 / 3 * 1.25)}
= Min { 0.05 0.05)
Cpk = 0.050
Answer:
The correct answer is True.
Explanation:
Product differentiation is a competitive strategy that aims to make the consumer perceive the good or service offered by a company differently from those of the competition.
The cost leadership strategy is to find and maintain a low cost position compared to the competition, this will allow the company to obtain higher returns than the industry average.
There is a relationship between the cost leadership strategy and the possession of a high market share, this is because having a high market share allows the appearance of economies of scale and economies of experience, both contribute to reducing unit costs.
Answer:
not satisfying customer needs on critical factors.
Explanation:
In this scenario American companies were supplying more of left hand side cars to Japan. When Japan needed more of the right hand side cars. They ignored the customer needs and instead gave him what he has little use for.
On the other hand Germany supplied Japan the specification of cars that they wanted.
American car manufacturers will be blamed for not satisfying customer needs on critical factor of right hand drive cars.
In this case, you would want to avoid a win-lose situation.
1. You would want a win-win (where both parties feel as though they are gaining something from the transaction).
2. You can never go into an international negotiation with the same mentality as you would for in the US. Every culture is different and you should be aware of those differences.
3. You should not move too quickly between subjects. You should always ensure all parties understand and agree, which may take time.
Answer:
C) The invisible hand
Explanation:
Daniel here seeking to produce and increase his welfare is "led by an invisible hand" to negotiate with his suppliers and to sell goods to his neighbors in a way that everybody is better off as a result from these transactions.
This is also a clear example to what Adam Smith was referring to the invisible hand:
"in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention. Nor is it always the worse for the society that it was not part of it. By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it. " Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Book 4, Chapter 2
