Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>
Explanation:
In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.
This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
Answer: A
C and D are wrong right off the bat because building a railroad during bad whether is not enjoyable or easy, plus it took seven years to build so it was not fun
It is not B because the passage does not state anything about people preferring to ride in wagons to riding by train
So it is A because truly it was a difficult process
Roosevelt was able to convince Congress to declare war on Japan by convincing them of the need to retaliate for Japan's actions at Pearl Harbor.
<h3>What did Japan do at Pearl Harbor?</h3>
In December 1941, the Japanese Navy attacked Pearl Harbor in Hawaii and killed thousands of people.
As a result of this clear provocation, Roosevelt asked Congress to declare war on Japan to avenge the violation of U.S. territorial integrity.
Find out more on the Pearl Harbor attack at brainly.com/question/860420.
#SPJ1
