Answer:
probability = 0.183 %
Explanation:
given data
produce products = 3 %
probability for producing products b = 6.1
solution
Both companies produce different products and the likelihood of bankruptcy varies depending on the product produced. So, the bankruptcy potential of A and B companies is independent.
we will multiply the probability of each company's bankruptcy and that will be
probability = P(A=bankrupt) × P(B=bankrupt)
probability = 3% × 6.1%
probability = 0.183 %
Somewhat fair. Not really from the different POV from now and then. But from the people of pasts understanding they may have thought what we do now was wrong. But I think some things we have done in the past has made America what it is today. There is not much judgement from it because there’s not much we can do to change the pay
Answer:
Explanation:The Economic Issues series aims to make available to a broad readership of nonspecialists some of the economic research being produced in the International Monetary Fund on topical issues. The raw material of the series is drawn mainly from IMF Working Papers, technical papers produced by Fund staff members and visiting scholars, as well as from policy-related research papers. This material is refined for the general readership by editing and partial redrafting.
The following paper draws on material originally contained in IMF Working Paper 97/42, "Deindustrialization: Causes and Implications," by Robert Rowthorn, Professor of Economics, Cambridge University, and Ramana Ramaswamy of the IMF’s Research Department. Neil Wilson prepared the present version. Readers interested in the original Working Paper may purchase a copy from IMF Publication Services
23,000. You would just subtract the liabilities.
Answer:
Neither the same nor the opposite
Explanation:
<em>Two heads are better than one</em> is an idiom meaning that it's easier to solve a problem or come up with an idea with the help of another person than alone.
<em>Two is company, three is a crowd </em>is an idiom usually associated with a romantic context. It's used to say that a third person should leave when two people (e.g. lovers) want to be together on their own.
So, when we compare these explanations, we can't say that these two sentences mean the same, nor the opposite.
