Answer:
A)
Explanation:
The main difference between these two terms is that a concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority. Each of which tends to ocurr often in court cases where various judges analyze and pass judgment of another judges decision on a specific case. With a concurring opinion most, if not all, judges agree with the decision that has been made but tend to give different reasons as to why they believe the decision was justified.
Answer:
I beleive the answer is b. Socail Contact.
Explanation:
The correct answer is that the limitation of this field study "determining direction of causality would be difficult because data are correlation & so many factors affect real life situations, it would be hard to control all the variables that creates findings harder to interpret."
In the given situation, because of the many factors present in the study and it affects real life situations, which are uncontrollable, which is why this study has this kind of limitation.
Answer:
They remain less developed than their colonial powers
Explanation:
After comparing the two maps, The two maps specify about regions that gained independence during the second half of the twentieth century that they remain less developed than their colonial powers.
In 1945, during the postwar era, were some prospect that decolonization might be gradually coming to stay and on the term thatis favourable to the western European colonial nations retaining their world power position.
When comparing the two maps in respect of human development, it is clearly seen that the region that gained independence during the second half of the twentieth century that they lag behind those that colonised them
