Answer: It produces inefficient economic results under certain conditions
Explanation: The above situation is known as the paradox of voting,which tries to show that the cost of voting will always be higher than the result obtained from the voting process.This is because Majority voting undermines the importance of an individual voter. This issue was first highlighted in 1793 by Nicolas de Condorcet,where noted that in a single stage election the influence of a single voter reduces as the number of voters increase.
The paradox of voting further highlights that the expected results/outcome of a voter from an electioneering process is less than what the initial expectations.
Answer: woooo we will call and ask you what they want for your drink please thank you for sharing this message thank love for
Yoooo this guy is vgayehejevr
Explanation:
Yea
Answer:
A). It was an unusually violent strike.
Explanation:
The federal government became involved in the American Railway Union's strike against Pullman company as it was an unusually violent strike that could not be overlooked as it affected the freight badly. The federal government carries the right to intervene in labor disputes or strikes especially when it adopts a violent form. The Pullman strike badly affected the nation's freight. Thus, the federal government interfered to end this protest in order to get the things back to normal by ordering the army to control the strikers and when they(strikers that were obstructing the trains) refused to violate the judicial order, they were imprisoned. Thus, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.
Mostly republicans, a lot of democrats don’t touch on the issue because that could take their seat away that they’ve been sitting in for years. Yes, republicans have people that have been there forever but they actually bring it up.
