The answer is "<span>Today's older people are happier than college students."
</span>
A cross-sectional study is a kind of observational investigation that dissects information from a populace, or an agent subset, at a particular point in time, that is, cross-sectional data. Cross-sectional examinations are instinctively clear and take into consideration the examination of countless. The strategies can be institutionalized by the scientist, and obvious definitions can be connected to the presentation and the endpoints.
In respect of the above-mentioned question regarding the order in Marylands court can be placed- Court of Appeals, Court of Special Appeals, Circuit Courts, District Court.
The overall outcome of the Marbury vs madison case was that the judicial review was established and thus a stronghold of the federal judiciary was also maintained. Hence, option C is appropriate.
The Court of appeals can be compared to the SupremeCourt of the United States. Hence, option D is appropriate.
After the case of Marbury vs madison was over Marbury died. Hence, the above statement is false, therefore option B is appropriate.
<h3>What happened in the madison Vs Marbury case?</h3>
The Madison vs Marbury case showed the world the most important thing regarding the notion and understanding of the most important people and also a lot to be helped about. The case gave the United States to strengthen its Federal judiciary. For the first time, Judicial review was introduced in the court by the Supreme Court.
Learn more about the Marbury Vs Madison case here:
brainly.com/question/12300066
#SPJ1
In the year 100 it would only be logical to try to keep protests down. With an empire stretching from Northern Scotland All the way to Rome Italy. If you tried to simply suppress a population that large every loyal Roman Man would have to drafted and sent to the Legions to fight their own disloyal subjects. While if they keep the barbs content they can turn their eye to their enemies such as Boadicea or the Parthians.
