By now, we’ve all experienced disinformation in political and social spheres firsthand. We’ve witnessed consequences of “distorting democratic discourse; manipulating elections; eroding trust in institutions; weakening journalism; exacerbating social divisions; undermining public safety; and inflicting hard-to-repair damage on the reputation of prominent individuals, including elected officials and candidates for office,” according to a warning raised in a 2018 in-depth report.
Misinformation is false information spread with no ill intent. Disinformation is generally understood as content that is fabricated, manipulated and distributed by imposters or content that is presented in a false context with intent to harm.
Now, disinformation is moving into the corporate sector. Organized crime and sophisticated actors borrow disinformation techniques and methods and use the same creation and distribution mechanisms used in politically motivated disinformation campaigns.
In one notable instance of disinformation, a forged US Department of Defense memo stated that a semiconductor giant’s planned acquisition of another tech company had prompted national security concerns, causing the stocks of both companies to fall. In other incidents, widely publicized unfounded attacks on a businessman caused him to lose a bidding war, a false news story reported that a bottled water company’s products had been contaminated, and a foreign state’s TV network falsely linked 5G to adverse health effects in America, giving the adversary’s companies more time to develop their own 5G network to compete with US businesses.
Perhaps most frightening: As defenses against disinformation improve, disinformants simply innovate, steadily coming up with new strategies for evading detection.
Answer:
This information about Jon that he and the others were unaware of would fall under the unknown area in the Johari Window before the incident.
Explanation:
The Johari Window is a technique developed by psychologists in 1955. It is commonly used in self-help groups. The Window consists of four areas: open, blind, hidden, and unknown. From a list of adjectives, a subject selects the ones that describe him/herself. Then his/her peers also select adjectives from the list to describe the subject.
In the open area, the adjectives that were selected by the subject as well as the peers are placed. In the blind area, the adjectives selected only by the peers are placed, showing what is perceived by others but not by the subject. In the hidden area, the adjectives selected only by the subject are placed. Finally,<u> in the unknown area, the adjectives that were not selected by any of them are placed.</u>
<u>As we can see, anything that is unaware to the subject or his peers falls under the "unknown" category. However, the subject might very well have those qualities. It's just that he and others haven't seen them being displayed yet. That's precisely what we have in Jon's case. No one knew of his strength, independence, and optimism until he finally displayed those qualities due to an incident. Therefore, they would have fallen under the unknown area before that incident.</u>
I believe the answer is: because metabolic reactions proceed too fast or slow
because of this, the Body temperature would be changed along with it. When the metabolic reactions proceed too fast, the body temperature of the person would increase above normal. When the reactions are too slow, the temperature would be reduced below normal.
