Answer:
Conflict Theorists.
Explanation:
This statement states that a powerful group of elites created the institution of the state to maintain a status quo that exists to benefit themselves. As this is done by the use of power, both financial and political, it ignores the wishes of those who do not wield any power or influence, and the thought process behind this is stemming from an ideology which exists to fight for limited resources, this is synonymous with how Marx described the Conflict theory.
Answer: engagement
Explanation:
Engaged employees are not those who work hard because they have to but they are the one who actual understand the goal and the mission of the company and they make it their own. They are personal invested in seeing the company reach that goal.
Usually these employees are motivated by the investment that the company also put on them.
They emotionally care for the company that they work for and for them it's not about just getting paid for the work that they do or being moved into the next level but it's about seeing the company succeed.
Answer: cultural diversity has its positive impact only if there is democracy, i.e. free movement of goods, ideas, people. If there is this freedom, then Europe is an extremely creative, free and progressive place. Europeans experienced times of nationalism, wars, revolutions so Europe in itself is not a guarantee of creativity, freedom and progressive thinking, but if there is a population able to establish really "European lifestyle" than diversity can have unique consequences.
Explanation: usually there is a tendency to supress differentness, but Europe experiences the worst consequences of such tendency so there is some sort of notion that diversity is creative and productive and that it is worth of taking care of. Impact ? Populations speaking different languages. educated, flexible, able to work with advanced technologies, psychologically open, accostumed to "different" things, able to travel to distant places and learn.
The decision in Marbury v. Madison said that the judicial department must <u>a. enforce</u> the law.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Marbury v. Madison was a critical case handled by Supreme Court of America. This case helps in bringing some special powers to judicial department in the United States of America.
According to this review, the courts in America gained the power to knock down the laws, order, and even some actions taken by government which causes violation of the Constitution of the United States of America.
The judicial department of America have acquired to power to change the law and order of the constitution. The decision in Marbury v. Madison was taken by chief justice: <u>John Marshall.
</u>
Michał Borkowski, Tomasz Kraus, and Łukasz Haluch
