Answer: She can sell each ton of coffee for $3
Explanation: hope it helps
Answer:
- No, the points are evenly distributed about the x-axis.
Explanation:
<u>1. Write the table with the data:</u>
x given predicted residual
1 - 3.5 - 1.1
2 - 2.9 2
3 - 1.1 5.1
4 2.2 8.2
5 3.4 1.3
<u>2. Complete the column of residuals</u>
The residual is the observed (given) value - the predicted value.
- residual = given - predicted.
Thus, the complete table, with the residual values are:
x given predicted residual
1 - 3.5 - 1.1 - 2.4
2 - 2.9 2 - 4.9
3 - 1.1 5.1 - 6.2
4 2.2 8.2 - 6.0
5 3.4 1.3 2.1
<u>3. Residual plot</u>
You must plot the last column:
x residual
1 - 2.4
2 - 4.9
3 - 6.2
4 - 6.0
5 2.1
See the plot attached.
<em>Does the residual plot show that the line of best fit is appropriate for the data?</em>
Ideally, a residual plot for a line of best fit that is appropiate for the data must not show any pattern; the points should be randomly distributed about the x-axis.
But the points of the plot are not randomly distributed about the x-axis: there are 4 points below the x-axis and 1 point over the x-axis: there are more negative residuals than positive residuals. This is a pattern. Also, you could say that they show a curve pattern, which drives to the same conclusion: the residual plot shows that the line of best fit is not appropiate for the data.
Thus, the conclusion should be: No, the points have a pattern.
- 1. "<em>Yes, the points have no pattern</em>": false, because as shown, the points do have a pattern, which makes the residual plots does not show that the line of best fit is appropiate for the data.
- 2. "<em>No, the points are evenly distributed about the x-axis</em>": true. As already said the points have a pattern. It is a curved pattern, and this <em>shows the line of best fit is not appropiate for the data.</em>
- 3. "<em>No, the points are in a linear pattern</em>": false. The points are not in a linear pattern.
- 4. "<em>Yes, the points are in a curved pattern</em>": false. Because the points are in a curved pattern, the residual plot shows that the line of best fit is not appropiate for the data.
Answer:1.naging malungkot
you got this keep trying harder
The statement which describes this phenomenon is; Electrons flow freely into the magnetic field, causing the paper clips to move.
<h3>Metals and the Electromagnetic field</h3>
- Metals are made up of positively charged atoms of elements in which case the outermost orbital of these metal atoms contain electrons revolving round them.
On this note, upon interaction with the electromagnetic field posed by an electromagnet placed nearby, it follows that;
- The Valence electrons flow freely into the magnetic field created by the electromagnet and hence, causes the paperclip to move.
The complete question contains options given are;
Metal paper clips do not attract or repel each other. When an electromagnet is placed nearby, the paper clips can be observed to move toward it. Which statement describes this phenomenon?
- Paper clips turn into permanent magnets after exposure to a magnetic field.
- The electromagnet reacts to the strong force of attraction from paper clips.
- Electrons flow freely into the magnetic field, causing the paper clips to move.
- Magnetic domains within the paper clips align with the magnetic field.
Read more on electromagnets and metal chips;
brainly.com/question/5602221