1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lukranit [14]
1 year ago
5

In the 16th and 17th centuries, _______________________________.

History
1 answer:
nikklg [1K]1 year ago
6 0

In the era of the 16th and 17th centuries, the European nation claims that some leaders formed Native Americans to fight with foreign powers.

What happened during the 16th and 17th centuries?

In the 16th and 17th centuries, the New World had already occupied the land of the Native Americans by the Europeans. And the Native Americans resisted the Europeans' ways to gain more profit from their land. And it is controlled by the diplomacy way, which results in new diseases, slave trades, etc. in North America.

Later, the European nation claims that the Native American nation has formed an alliance to fight with the foreign power. And they won the English war and claimed to occupy the entire land of the Mississippi River. But some parts were given to the Native Americans also.

To learn more about the 16th and 17th century of the Native Americans from the given link:

<u>brainly.com/question/28424816</u>

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
What was the result of the Supreme Court decision for Dred Scott v. Sanford?
kotykmax [81]

Answer:

It ruled against Dred Scott and set aside the Missouri Compromise and popular sovereignty.

Explanation:

The case Dred Scott v. Sanford argued whether a slave can obtain his freedom when he step on a state that make slavery illegal.

It happened in 1857. At that time, Dred Scott's (A slave) was taken by his owner from Missouri to Illinois. (According to Missouri compromise,  It is still legal to own slaves in Missouri but It is Illegal to do so in Illinois).

Scott tried to make his case to the court stating that as soon as he entered Illinois, his status as a slave should be voided and he should be considered as a citizen.

At that time, The Missouri supreme court ruled against Scott's plead. The court stated that he could never be a citizen since citizenship only apply to white people. So he's still a slave no matter where his slave owner took him.

7 0
3 years ago
At the constitutional convention larger states eagerly supported the.. ?
swat32
<span>At the constitutional convention larger states eagerly supported the "Virginia Plan," since this would have made representation in Congressed based only on state population size. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question refers to the image below.
Sophie [7]

Answer:

Costs for medical care were rising, and fewer people had access to adequate care.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
1) Who is W.E.B. Du Bois? Where did he obtain his PhD?
Nady [450]

1. William Edward Burghardt Du Bois is an activist from America and he obtained his PhD from Havard University.

  • 2. He studied sociology and made his investigations in University of Pennsylvania.
  • 3. William Edward Burghardt Du Bois finding while studying the sociology of the society was that change in the society could be achieved by means of protest.
  • 4. The racial formation theory is a theory which uses sociology to identify and shape races of people. This formation theory has a relationship with Du Bois in that he himself too was a sociologist and describes this theory as an empirical science.
  • 5. Race is not a biological thing.
  • 6. Class is more of important than race simply because the ethnicity of different groups of people is still a subject of social class in any system.

<h3>Why race is not a biological thing</h3>

The simple reason why race has no biological connection is simply because it is more of a social attribute.

So therefore, we can confirm from the explanation above that W.E.B. Du Bois was an intellectual individual.

Read more on race:

brainly.com/question/27129680

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
What are two differences between physiocrats and the mercantilists
sleet_krkn [62]

Answer:

Physiocrats supported free trade and a government free buissness society, but the mercantilists wanted government regulated economy, high tariffs, and A balance of trade.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What message did the Boston Tea Party send to the king? that there needed to be an increase in export tax that the quality of go
    12·1 answer
  • What was the british government position regarding the success of industrialization
    12·2 answers
  • When and where did ptolemy make his astronomical observations?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did recruiting for the army become more difficult
    11·1 answer
  • Why did Axum's marketplace develop a blended culture?
    15·1 answer
  • What was the effect of Jim Crow laws?
    11·2 answers
  • What makes China an unlimited government
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the rights included in the english bill of rights has the most influence on our government
    5·1 answer
  • Fossils, like the Mesosaurus found on both Africa and South America and the Glossopteris plant found on several continents, help
    8·2 answers
  • What are some other things Americans might have wanted in their<br> homes once they got electricity?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!