Answer:
Risk and Return
1. Joe is an average investor. His financial advisor gave him options of investing in stock A, with a σ of 12%, and stock B, with a σ of 9%. Both stocks have the same expected return of 16%. Joe can pick only one stock and decides to invest in stock B.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
2. Marcie works for an educational technology firm that recently launched its employee stock option plan (ESOP). Marcie allocated all her investments in the ESOP.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
3. rin wants to invest in a hedge fund that has had a very strong performance track record. The hedge fund has given its investors a return of over 60% for the past five years. Although Erin is tempted to put her money in the fund, she decides to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund’s assets, because she is aware that past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
Explanation:
1. Joe's decision to invest in stock B is a good financial decision. Since both investments have the same returns, the decision on which investment to take shifts to the standard deviation of the returns, which specifies the variability of the returns. Invariably, the investment with less standard deviation should win the vote. Therefore, Joe's decision is a good financial decision because investment in B has a standard deviation of 9% unlike A's 12%.
2. Putting all eggs in one market as Marcie had done by allocating all her investments in the ESOP is not a good financial decision, theoretically. It is always best to spread the risks, though higher-yielding investments (returns) bear higher risks.
3. The decision of Erin to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund's assets, despite its past performance is a good financial decision. Due diligence reveals some behind-the-scene information that are instrumental in making sound business decisions. Who are the present managers of the fund? What systems are in place in the entity to guarantee similar future performance, all things being equal? What market's sentiments and information are available for consideration? These questions, and many others can be answered through a due diligence. Surely, "past performance is no guarantee of future results."
Answer:
The answer is A. Standards refer to a company's projected revenues, costs, or expenses
Explanation:
The explanation is the following:
A budget refers to a department's or a company's projected revenues, costs, or expenses, while on the other hand A standard usually refers to a projected amount per unit of product, per unit of input (such as direct materials, factory overhead), or per unit of output.
Standard costing is intensive in application as it calls for detailed analysis of variances.
In standard costing, variances are usually revealed through accounts.
Standard costs represent realistic yardsticks and are, therefore, more useful for controlling and reducing costs.
Answer:
Total fixed cost $16,000
unit fixed cost for 10,000 units $1.60
Explanation:
the budget was made for 8,000 units
so the 2.00 dollars for fixed cost will be based on a production for 8,000 units
total fixed cost: 8,000 budgeted units x $2 per unit = 16,000
This is the level of fixed cost.
<u>For 10,000 units the total fixed cost should be the same.</u>
and for units it will be total cost / units of production
16,000 / 10,000 = 1.6
On unit-level it will drop by 40 cent to $1.60 from $2.00
They could end up financing them too much and need to borrow more money from China (we are very much in debt right now) nd then we would have more to pay
Answer:
The statement is false
Explanation:
Channel design process is the one which is defined as those decisions that involve the development of the new marketing channels where the modification of the existing channels or none had existed before, which requires the market power as well as the financial strength of the members of the supply chain.
Therefore, the manufacturer could lead the process of the design process irrespective of the financial strength of members as well as the market power.
