Answer:
C, Raises aggregate expenditure by raising liable income, thereby increasing consumption.
Explanation:
Tax is a very important financial tool of any governmet to ensure its smooth running.
Tax can either be increased or decreased and each of these acts have their effects on the the counrty and on its people. For the purpose of this question, i will be sticking to tax decrease.
Tax decrease as the name implies is the reduction of taxes paid by individuals to the government from their taxable incomes.
When tax is reduced, there is a little more money for the people to spend and as such this affects the demand, consumption (of goods) as well as the gross domestic profit; GDP, of the country.
When the people have more money to spend, there is an increase in things they buy, wear, do, etc and so production in that country becomes high.
Tax decrease is most effective in a situations where there is high level of unemployment and slow paced economies.
cheers.
When comparing Mexico to Scotland, you would expect Scottish workers to have greater productivity and higher labour cost per worker
Explanation:
One may expect that a Scotland plant will be less labour intensive and efficient per worker than just Mexican facilities as a more advanced technological nation and that "higher productivity and low labour cost" will be the right answer.
Both possibilities for lower productivity can be excluded as they demonstrate lower productivity. "Higher productivity, but less energy per job" is not the solution because it recognises lower labour costs per worker rather than higher.
The increase in labour productivity relies, according to certain studies, on three key factors: innovation and capital goods saving, modern technology and human capital.
Answer:
The last option is the answer -$141.80
Explanation:
we will use the present value formula for Trish she gets paid every first day of the month therefore she will receive an immediate payment of cash flow which will be added to the present value of future periodic value. Therefore we will find the difference between present values for Trish and Josh which have the same amounts which they'll receive per month.
Given: Trish and josh both receive $450 per month therefore that will be C the monthly future payment that will be received.
They will receive these amounts in a course period of Four years so that will be n = 4 x12=48 because we know that they will receive these payments every month or on a monthly basis for four years. which n represent periodic payments.
i which is the discount rate of 9.5%/12 as we know they will recieve these amounts monthly.
Therefore using the following formulas for present value annuity:
Pv = C[(1-(1+i)^-n)/i] and Pv= C[(1-(1+i)^-n)/i](1+i) then get the difference between these two present values for Trish and Josh.
therefore we will substitute the above values on the above mentioned formula to get the difference:
Pv= 450[(1-(1+9.5%/12)^-48)/(9.5%/12)] - 450[(1-(1+9.5%/12)^-48)/(9.5%/12)](1+9.5%/12) then we compute and get
Pv= $17911.77614 - $18053.5777
Pv = -$141.80 is the difference between the two sets of present values as one has an immediate payment and one doesn't have it.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Exclusion upto $103,900. Taxable amount is $6100.</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
<em>US natives</em>, just as changeless occupants, are required to document ostracize expense forms with the government consistently paying little mind to where they dwell.
Alongside the <em>common assessment</em> form for money, numerous individuals are likewise required to present an arrival revealing resources which are held in ledgers in remote nations. Notwithstanding where you live, you should record <em>expat imposes in the US.</em>
