The immediate effect was that it divided the newly discovered land in South America along a line. With lands to the west of a line belonging to Castile and the land to the east belonging to Portugal.
It would be more logical to have an abundant amount of resources than to be in a center of a training route. Thomas Jefferson's Embargo Act of 1807 is an example. America suffered more even though it was meant to punish France and Great Britain. If America had more supplies then they wouldn't have any issue with trading with someone else. America is across the sea so it is hard to believe they were in the center of the training route.
Having a good location is important, but if there isn't enough to trade then that creates more issues. One would be that the area could become a reputation for being unreliable. It does come to the question if the loads of resources is worth traveling for or to take a route that's faster but there isn't a lot of give. Being isolated also means that of there happens to be an issue in the trade then the location is either off the maps or people don't want to there because of the distance and the prices might be able to go up. That's why resources are better than location.
<h3>The Freedom Fighters of UAE are:-</h3><h3>1. Nasser bin Ghaith </h3><h3>2. Ahmed Mansoor </h3><h3>3. Fahad Salim Dalk </h3><h3>4. Hassan Ali Al Khamis </h3><h3>5. Ahmed Abdul Khaleq </h3>
I believe the correct answer is B
