I would change certain laws that I thought were incorrect or unfair (though I would have to get permission from Congress first). Also, I would look at the people (citizen's of the US)'s view on things and I would help everyone to be somewhat satisfied. It would take a lot of work, however.
Answer:
a) Unity of Effort
Explanation:
These challenges are best met when all capabilities are integrated and synchronized to achieve Unity of Effort. This refers to the state of harmonizing the different efforts among various sections or departments in order to work towards a similar objective, thus reducing the duplication of effort from those departments working on different objectives which will eventually lead to the common objective.
Answer:
The answer is hard influence tactics and soft influence tactics.
Explanation:
Hard influence tactics are those tactics that use direct and authoritative sources of power, like their authority coming from and organization, for example. Position power depends on the authority granted to someone by a government or company. Soft influence tactics are those indirect and collaborative tactics like persuasion that convinces someone to adopt a position themselves like having the kind of personal power that can attract followers and makes coworkers look up to you.
This was actually a very smart behaviour. This way the law was accessible to everyone so on one hand, noone could say "I didn't know" and on the other hand it could be used for reference by anyone and people would not need to seek council in every matter. This also decreased the possibility to abuse power (if the law was only accessible to few, those few could abuse their power by manipulating it in their favour).
I believe the answer is: <span>experience learned helplessness
</span><span>experiening learned helplessness would make indiviudals to perceive the current problems that they face seems to be bigger than it actually is.
This perception would make those individuals to give up more easily and fall into depression.</span>
