1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yuliya22 [10]
2 years ago
7

According to the erosion model of organizational commitment, the employee with the fewest emotional bonds is the most likely to

quit. True or false?.
Business
1 answer:
Likurg_2 [28]2 years ago
4 0

The statement, according to the erosion model of an organizational commitment, the employee with the fewest emotional bonds is the most likely to quit, is true.

The erosion model explains that an organization's employee who have less or fewer emotional bonds tend to quit the organization because they do not feel or get involved in the organization, or they don't feel any attachment to it.

Here the social influence model states that suppose when two employees are closely related or have good terms, so if one of them quits their work, then the other one is more likely to follow them and leave the organization.

Hence, the erosion model suggests that employees with fewer bonds will be most likely to quit the organization.

To learn more about erosion model here:

brainly.com/question/28444776

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
Computronics, inc. has a current ratio of 1.5. this implies that if the firm liquidates its current assets in order to pay off i
Eddi Din [679]
<span>If the figure of 1.5 represents the debt ratio of the firm then it can be inferred that the liabilities of the firm greatly exceed current assets. Without further information as to the values of Computronics, inc. current assets and liabilities the price at which the firm can sell its assets cannot be computed. However it can be stated that the firm must sell current assets at a premium of 50% of the value of the assets in order to recoup the debt of its current liabilities.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Explain precisely why ‘Opportunity Cost’ is always a RELATIVE concept and is never to be construed in ABSOLUTE terms. In additio
telo118 [61]

Answer:

Opportunity costs are defined as the additional costs or benefits lost from choosing one activity or investment over another alternative. It is a relative concept because you cannot be 100% sure that the other investments or activities would have yielded a specific gain.

For example, when you calculate the economic cost of starting your own business, you consider your current salary as an opportunity cost. But what happens if you get fired (or the company closes), your opportunity cost would have been $0? Or how can you exactly measure your future salaries? Maybe in a couple of years you get promoted to manager, or maybe not?

The same applies to economies, since the opportunity cost of producing certain tradable goods is not always fixed, it might decrease or increase due to productivity or efficiency changes. But in order to calculate or determine we must include the most probable option.

In microeconomics, a strictly convex production possibilities frontier function must include a combination of both goods. In strict convexity, the second derivative f''(x) ˃ 0, so the PFF curve cannot be straight, it must have a slope.

When we calculate the opportunity costs of PPF, we usually try to determine which product has the lowest opportunity cost, but that is not an interior solution because both goods are not being produced (the curve is not strictly convex). On a strictly convex curve, as you approach the extremes the opportunity cost of producing one good is high, but on the center the opportunity cost is much lower.

3 0
4 years ago
when your combining like terms and there is only a negative outside of the parethisis what do you do??
ruslelena [56]
You mutiply the outside number by the 1st number on the inside of the paranthesis
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The models for responding to either liked or disliked changes both end in
Nookie1986 [14]
<span>A. 
constructive direction.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
If the economy is at potential output, and the Fed _____ the money supply, in the long run, the price level will likely _____.
serg [7]

Answer:

If the economy is at the potential output and the Fed increases the money supply, in the long run real GDP will likely remain the same.

Explanation:

hoped this helped

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A type of high school diploma available to students with disabilities who are not able to meet the requirements for a standard d
    9·2 answers
  • Quality Progress, February 2005, reports on improvements in customer satisfaction and loyalty made by Bank of America. A key mea
    12·1 answer
  • Rennie Norquist is a recent law school graduate. She is employed at Dillard Dobbs Dooley &amp; Duncan, LLP, a 200 lawyer firm. R
    15·1 answer
  • What is an advantage of a Limited Liability Company?
    11·1 answer
  • Thakin Industries Inc. manufactures dorm furniture in separate processes. In each process, materials are entered at the beginnin
    10·1 answer
  • Oslo Company prepared the following contribution format income statement based on a sales volume of 1,000 units (the relevant ra
    8·1 answer
  • Tomorrow is my interview in Lucknow Public School for admission for 9th standard. Can anyone help me by giving some tips and tri
    5·1 answer
  • The Sisyphean Company's common stock is currently trading for $25.50 per share. The stock is expected to pay a $2.80 dividend at
    12·1 answer
  • Based on the substitution effect, which example reflects how people would likely respond to a rise in gas prices
    10·1 answer
  • The ability to capture and analyze all customer interactions, generate appropriate responses, and gather data to create and buil
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!