<span>The
Gessler brothers are actually German immigrants who are not wealthy but poor. But
their admirable quality is that they seem contented with what they do and in
whatever situation they live. The other admirable quality is that Gessler
brothers display integrity and hard work coupled with dedication in their work
which is a rare quality.</span>
<span />
That means that there is no inequality between the factors (health, income and education) within people in a country.
When that is the case, there is no inequity aversion* and the country will be ranked in a higher position depending on the percentages.
* Inequity aversion occurs when, there is is a difference in a specific index amidst people. When it doesn't occur, people have similar health conditions, similar incomes and education.
Hope it helped,
BioTeacher101
(If you have any questions feel free to ask them in the comments)
The answer is artifacts. This is anything - physical articles, for example, apparel, homes, and autos, that show to others a man's close to home and social convictions and propensities. For instance, you stroll into a classroom, with a sweater. This piece of attire are considered antiques that are imparting to you a wide assortment of data. Sweater demonstrates warmth which at that point says you were cool.
Answer:
Integration Stage
Explanation:
According to the question and various research into the stages of minority identity development, It is said that Vivian is currently in the Integration Stage. In this stage, the person starts to accept and appreciate their own culture which then leads to them starting to appreciate and accept other peoples various and different cultures. Causing them to have a more open mind towards minorities and life.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The answer is "C", <u>"as similar as possible"</u>.
Applying the relevant rule of law to the facts of a case regularly requires finding beforehand decided cases that, in response to the case under thought, are as similar as could be expected under the circumstances. Dissimilar to most civil law frameworks, common law frameworks take after the method of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their own particular past decisions in comparative cases, and all lower courts, should choose decisions complying with past decisions of higher courts.
