The common denominator for decisions on service processes is customer contact while but for manufacturing processes, it is product variety.
<h3>What is a common denominator?</h3>
This refers to the feature that is shared by all members, item, quantity of a subject matter.
Hence, the common denominator for decisions on service processes is customer contact while but for manufacturing processes, it is product variety.
Read more about common denominator
<em>brainly.com/question/542317</em>
#SPJ12
Answer:
Successful innovation allows you to add value to your business so that you can increase your profits—if you don't innovate well, your business will plateau. Innovation helps you stay ahead of the competition. With globalization and a rapidly changing market, there are more competing businesses than ever before.
<h2><u>
Hope This Helped!</u></h2>
Answer: Is not taxed
Explanation: John owns 500 shares of stock in Catawba Box, Inc. He is the share holder of the company . An equity shareholder is the owner of the company. But for a big public limited company, they raise funds by going public and issuing shares to the public in small tranche. The profit earned by the company is taxable for the company while it is not taxed to the owners or the shareholders of the company as a company is a separate legal entity.
Answer: $204,800
Explanation:
When a good is shipped FOB shipping point, it means that the buyer assumes responsibility for the goods as soon as the goods reach the place they will be shipped from. The purchase from Pelzer should therefore be included in inventory because it has already been shipped.
A good shipped FOB Destination means that the buyer only assumes responsibility after the goods have been delivered to them. As the sale to Alvarez was still in transit, it is still the responsibility of Marigold and should be included in inventory.
Inventory is therefore:
= 155,000 + 28,000 + 21,800
= $204,800
Answer:
Misappropriation refers to the use of another person's intellectual property including their name or likeness without prior permission from the person which can then cause harm to that person.
This is indeed an example of misappropriation because the company tried to use Bette's likeness in the commercial. After being rebuffed by Bette saying that she does not do commercials for whatever business or personal reasons known to her, they still sought to use her popularity and image to make their products more popular.
To do so they hired a backup singer and told her to sing as much like Bette as she could so much so that even Bette's close acquaintances thought that it was Bette. If her close acquaintances could think it was her, imagine the general public.
They therefore made it seem as though Bette did their commercial which then would mean that Bette does in fact do commercials which would do damage her assertion that she does not do same. This would bring harm to her business relationships if for instance she had rebuffed other companies in the past when they sought her to do their commercials.
This is a case of Misappropriation and Bette should sue.
