A, B, D ,and E statements are correct
Explanation:
The main reason for the annual report is that it is utilized by investors when they expect future income and dividend from the company as well as the risks associated with those cash flows.
The statement of income shows the difference between the income and costs of a company–that is, its profits–over a given duration. Nevertheless, any income reported comes in cash and the expenditure reported always reflects cash expenditures. There will therefore be no substantial difference for the same period between a company's profits reported and its real cash flow.
Suppose all companies follow generally accepted standards of transparency. Two years ago, both companies started operations with similar fixed assets worth $1 million, and neither company sold either or purchased any of these properties. All firms would have to report to their balance sheets the same amount of net fixed assets as the statements are sent to creditors.
Assets other than currency are expected to produce cash over time and the amount of cash they generate will be the same as the amounts on the ledger.
Answer:
d) the money supply should grow at a constant rate.
Explanation:
The Federal Reserve System (popularly referred to as the 'Fed') was created by the Federal Reserve Act, passed by the U.S Congress on the 23rd of December, 1913. The Fed began operations in 1914 and just like all central banks, the Federal Reserve is a United States government agency.
Generally, the Fed controls the issuance of currency in United States of America: it promotes public goals such as economic growth, low inflation, and the smooth operation of financial markets.
Monetary growth rule is a theory that was proposed by Friedman and it states that the Federal Reserve System (Fed) should be required to set or target the money supply growth rate to be equal to the growth rate of Real gross domestic product (GDP) each year and leaving the price level of goods and services unchanged.
Basically, this growth rate of gross domestic product (GDP) is usually set between 1% and 4%. Also, the monetary growth rule is also referred to as the K-Percent rule.
Hence, a monetary growth rule means that the money supply should grow at a constant rate.
Answer:
a. 1, 5 and 7
b. Resources will be allocated inefficiently
c. Differing sizes and capacities
d. Benefits due to economies of scale
e. Reduce prices and improve resource allocation.
Explanation:
The correct combination is 1, 5 and 7. The price of a pure monopoly firm is much higher than that of purely competitive firm because the later is a price taker while the former is a price fixer. Because of this, output of monopoly is lower while the profit margin is higher than that of competitive firm.
Assuming that a pure monopolist and a purely competitive firm have the same unit costs. In the case of a pure monopolist, resources will be allocated inefficiently because the monopolist does not produce at the point of minimum Average Total Cost and does not equate price and Marginal cost.
Even though both monopolists and competitive firms follow the MC = MR rule in maximizing profits, there are differences in the economic outcomes because pure competitors lack capacity and are smaller in size while the monopolist has the capacity to expand inorder to maximize profits.
The costs of a purely competitive firm and a monopoly may be different because the monopolist is capable of taking advantage of cost reduction arising from economics of scale. Pure competitors does not experience economies of scale due to their small sizes.
If a monopoly can experience economies of scale, it can reduce prices beyond that of the pure competitor thereby ensuring a more efficient resource allocation.
Answer:
The Pandemic has made chicken more expensive, in order to offset this effect to consumers, government subsidized the price of chickens by a per-unit subsidy. If it wants to study the substitution effect of this subsidy, the government should imposed a Lump-sum tax.
False
Explanation:
The government should have imposed a lump-sum subsidy if it really wanted to study the substitution effect of the subsidy instead of imposing a lump-sum tax. This subsidy should be granted to chicken farmers to reduce their production costs, which will in turn reduce the cost of chicken to the consumers. A lump-sum tax sounds like a contradictory effort to offset the high cost of chicken on the consumers.
It's a f<span>inancial plan that reflects anticipated revenue and
shows how it will be allocated in the operation of the business.. :)</span>
