Answer:
Minimising risk of loss
Explanation:
One of the most significant values of investment is to guarantee that you have a extended portfolio. The key advantage of constructing a portfolio is that it helps in Limiting danger of misfortune. If one venture performs ineffectively over a specific period, different speculations may perform better over that equivalent period, decreasing the potential misfortunes of your venture portfolio from concentrating all your capital under one kind of speculation.
Answer: The expected loss is $2.3
Explanation:
Total number of tickets to be sold = 100 tickets
one $450 prize, the expected gain = 450 x (1/100) = $4.5
two $110 prizes, the expected gain = 110 x (2/100) = $2.2
four $25 prizes. the expected gain = 25 x (4/100) = $1
Expected gain (loss) = Total expected gain - Cost of the ticket
= (4.5 + 2.2 + 1 ) - 10
= (2.3)
The expected loss is $2.3
Answer:
Basic EPS=$1.08
Explanation:
Basic EPS= Net income after tax-preferred shares' dividend/Weighted average of outstanding shares
Net income after tax=$360,000*.7=$252,000
Dividend to preference shareholders=20,000*1.8=$36,000
Weighted average shares outstanding=200,000
Basic EPS=($252,000-$36,000)/200,000
Basic EPS=$1.08
Answer:
The answer is expectancy.
Explanation:
Expectancy theory is a concept developed by Victor H. Vroom in 1964, where he postulated, that the strength an individual has in terms of his or her motivation to do an action, would appear when three components are satisfied to a certain value: expectancy, instrumentality, and valence. The question above is relevant to the expectancy component, which is detailed as the belief that an individual has regarding their efforts would result in the individual choosing to perform an action. In the case of Martha, she wasn’t sure that her efforts in trying to win the contract would lead to her 10% raise (outcome, a component of instrumentality), and thus, she decided not to try.
Answer:
b. Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1.
Explanation:
The Pregnancy Discrimination Act "prohibits sex discrimination on the basis of pregnancy." According to the act, "if an employee is temporarily unable to perform her job due to pregnancy, the employer must treat her the same as any other temporarily disabled employee".
Therefore, since Jean claims she cannot lift 90-pound boxes due to her pregnancy, she should be protected by this act.
