D. Activating Background knowledge
Answer:
B
Explanation:
This shows how the writer feels about the sentence. He/she thinks that it's a sad thing.
Answer:
W o a h, a r e y o u a s k ing ab o ut goo d us es of p h o n e or text messaging?
The word incredulous is used to show that Leila is shocked by what the driver of the convertible did (option D).
<h3>How to identify the meaning of the word unbeliever?</h3>
To identify the meaning of the word unbeliever in the sentence we must take into account the context. According to the above, it can be inferred that Leila is shocked...
<h3>Why is Leila shocked?</h3>
It can be inferred that Leila is shocked because she cannot believe that the driver is driving recklessly.
Learn more about connation in: brainly.com/question/1443184
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer is "The emphasis of the speech stays on Wiesel's frightening experiences as a child." Wiesel's use of the first person allows him to give a more individual view of the story as a whole. These are his knowledges, they are not neutral because this is his story. The first person is the finest way for him to deliver the things he needs to tell, and the third person would have through the story more universal not personal.
Explanation:
I know that this is none of the answer choices but I hope it helps (: