Television impacted politics in all of these ways except <span>forcing politicians to be honest because they were speaking directly to the American public on air.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
</span>
Answer:
parietal
Explanation:
Parietal lobe: The term parietal lobe is defined as a part of the cerebral cortex that lies between the frontal and occipital lobe and above temporal lobe of an individual's brain.
The parietal lobe of an individual's brain is responsible for sensory integration and perception and encompasses the management of sight, smell, taste, touch, and hearing. It is considered as a home for the primary sensory area of the brain (the area where the brain interprets various inputs from different areas of an individual's body).
In the question above, Samantha's parietal lobe will be activated.
I believe the correct answer is the first option - W<span>estern cultures emphasize cognitive skills while Asian cultures stress on humility.
The other options are incorrect because it should be the other way round - Asian cultures value mindfulness, social skills, and awareness, whereas Western cultures prefer cooperativeness, verbal skills, and logic and reasoning. However, Asian cultures really value humility, whereas Westerners prefer their cognitive skills.
</span>
Hint: Pretend you are a Loyalist
Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
