Answer:
Amount of cash paid on Aug 16 = <u>$8,167.50</u>
Explanation:
As for the information provided the terms of purchase are,
1% discount if payment made within 10 days,
and a total credit period of 30 days without any discount beyond 10 days.
Here, inventory purchased on August 7 = $9,750
Less; Return on 11 August = $1,500
Net Purchases = $8,250
Since payment is made on 16 August that is within 10 days from purchase discount will be received
= $8,250 
1% = $82.50
Amount of cash paid on Aug 16 = $8,250 - $82.50 = $8,167.50
Answer:
a. Variable costing income from operations <u>is greater than </u>absorption costing income from operations.
b. $870,000
Explanation:
a. Under Variable costing, only the variable manufacturing costs are apportioned to the units produced.
Cost under Variable costing are;
= 114 * 14,500
= $1,653,000
Under Absorption Costing, both fixed and variable costs are apportioned to the units produced.
Cost therefore is;
= (114 + 60) * 14,500
= $2,523,000
Variable costing income from operations is greater than absorption costing income from operations because Absorption costs yields more cost.
b.= Absorption cost - Variable cost
= 2,523,000 - 1,653,000
= $870,000
<em>Variable costing income from operation will be $870,000 higher than Absorption costing income from operations.</em>
Answer:
a. No, because Shelby made a mistake about the dog's value, not a mistake about a material fact.
Explanation:
Peggy made an offer to sell the dog for $800, they didn't discuss the dog's ancestry and Shelby wrongly assumed the dog was from champion lines and agreed to buy the dog for $800.
Based on further investigations, she discovered the dog was worth just $200.
She cannot rescind the contract because she wrongly assumed the dog's value not an error about à material fact. Peggy sold the dog at her own rates and Shelby bought the dog while wrongly assuming the value, so she cannot cancel the contract based on that.
