Answer: I would say A is the correct answer
Explanation:
The social groups in ancient Egypt were pharaoh, vizier, high priests and nobles.
Pharaoh were the kings of ancient Egypt. In Egyptian civilization, the pharaohs were considered living gods. The Egyptians believed that these rulers were direct children of the god Osiris, so they acted as intermediaries between the gods and the Egyptian population.
Vizier was Pharaoh's prime minister and assisted him in managing many kingdom affairs. He had the job of transmitting the king's orders, collecting taxes, administering justice, controlling the state of public works, and also controlling river transport.
High Priests in the social hierarchy below only in Pharaoh. Endued with enormous prestige and power, they were the Priests or responsible for religion and various functions in the administration of the Egyptian Empire. They were considered the wise men of Egypt.
Nobles the third class was intended for the nobles. Among them military chiefs, who were responsible for the security of Egyptian territory.
Answer:
(D). The ads taught girls to worry about their weights and negatively affected their body images.
Explanation:
The message passed across in Campbell Soup Company's ad, suggested that it was okay for girls to eat foods with low calorie intake but they should avoid high calorie intake foods.
<u>This ad passed across a message to young girls to worry about their weights and how they look physically.</u>
Answer:
Social responsibility is an ethical framework and suggests that an entity, be it an organization or individual, has an obligation to act for the benefit of society at large.[citation needed] Social responsibility is a duty every individual has to perform so as to maintain a balance between the economy and the ecosystems. A trade-off may exist between economic development, in the material sense, and the welfare of the society and environment,[1] though this has been challenged by many reports over the past decade.[when?][2][3] Social responsibility means sustaining the equilibrium between the two. It pertains not only to business organizations but also to everyone whose any action impacts the environment.[4] This responsibility can be passive, by avoiding engaging in socially harmful acts, or active, by performing activities that directly advance social goals. Social responsibility must be intergenerational since the actions of one generation have consequences on those following.[5]
Businesses can use ethical decision making to secure their businesses by making decisions that allow for government agencies to minimize their involvement with the corporation.[6] For instance if a company follows the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines for emissions on dangerous pollutants and even goes an extra step to get involved in the community and address those concerns that the public might have; they would be less likely to have the EPA investigate them for environmental concerns.[7] "A significant element of current thinking about privacy, however, stresses "self-regulation" rather than market or government mechanisms for protecting personal information".[8] According to some experts, most rules and regulations are formed due to public outcry, which threatens profit maximization and therefore the well-being of the shareholder, and that if there is not an outcry there often will be limited regulation.[9]
Some critics argue that corporate social responsibility (CSR) distracts from the fundamental economic role of businesses; others argue that it is nothing more than superficial window-dressing, or "greenwashing";[10] others argue that it is an attempt to pre-empt the role of governments as a watchdog over powerful corporations though there is no systematic evidence to support these criticisms. A significant number of studies have shown no negative influence on shareholder results from CSR but rather a slightly negative correlation with improved shareholder returns.[11]
Explanation:
plzz mark me as brainlist
Equal protection calls for state,to guarantee the same rights,priveleges, and protection for all the citizens. Substantive due process on the other hand calls upon court protection of certain fundamental rights from government interference, even if procedural protections are present or the rights are not specifically mentioned elsewhere in the US Constitution. The statute that was raised by the state conferred certain privileges on part of the motorists,requiring some to always wear helmets while others were not.
