Answer:
so the first picture is it graphed without solving it and the second graph is the answer to it graphed
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Neither parallel nor perpendicular
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm assuming you meant line k is y = 3x -2. If not, this is wrong.
For this, you need to put both lines in point-slope form, or the form that line k is already in. This means you only need to convert line m.
-2r + 6v = 18
6v = 2r + 18
v = 2/6r + 18/6
v = 1/3r + 3
Now you can answer the question.
To be parallel, lines must have the same slope (but a different y-intercept). 3 and 1/3 are not the same, so the lines are not parallel.
To be perpendicular, one line must have the opposite reciprocal (fraction flipped and + goes to - or - to +) of the other. While 3 is the reciprocal of 1/3, they are both positive, so they are not perpendicular.
To be the same line, the equations must be absolutely identical, which they aren't.
This leaves the last option: neither.
Let me know if you need a more in-depth explanation of anything here! I'm happy to help!
Answer:
22,000
Step-by-step explanation:
4%/100=0.04
0.04*50,000=20,000 || 130,000-50,000=80,000 ||
2%/100=0.02
0.02*100,000= 2,000 || 80,000 - 100,000 ||
To explain it simply, Rosie receives 20,000 in commission for the first 50,000 of the sale. However, she sold a property for 130,000 meaning she also receives 2,000 for the next 100,000. Therefore she receives $22,000 in total on her $130,000 sale.
Answer:
5/2
Step-by-step explanation:
7x-23+11x+23=180
4x+0=180
4x/4=180/4
X=45
Answer: x=45