Answer:
the Digby Corporation's total liabilities is $156.92 million
Explanation:
The computation of the total liabilities is given below:
Total Liabilities is
= Total Asset - (Total Common Stock + Retained Earnings)
= $210.761 - ($6.350 + $47.491)
= $210.761 - $6.350 - $47.491
= $156.92 million
Hence, the Digby Corporation's total liabilities is $156.92 million
The same should be relevant
Answer:
Lenders don't like risk because it can lose them money, so they're cautious on who they're lending to. They do this by checking people's credit history. They prefer people who have longer credit history even with a few blemishes that are corrected rather than lending to people who have a short clear history mainly because they have little to no experience and can be unpredictable what they may do.
Explanation:
Answer:
overcoming reservations
Explanation:
From the question we are informed about Pat who was talking with his customer about the new accounting system, his customer mentioned that she thought the new system was not going to fit into their budget. Pat explained that once her people were trained on it, it would require less time to process orders, and therefore save her money in payroll. The part of the sales presentation demonstrated in this case is an example of overcoming reservations.
Sales presentation can be regarded as sales pitch and it's a selling technique which can be explained as line of talk which is an attempts of persuading someone or something, using a planned sales presentation strategy of particular product/service which is been designed to initiate as well as close a sale of that particular product or service, example of this is overcoming reservations which is a method of persuading customers.
Answer: A bilateral contract. Option A.
Explanation: A bilateral contract is one in which both parties are bound by their promise to fulfill their side of the bargain.
Therefore by Jackson and Casey agreeing to meet to exchange book for money, they have formed a bilateral contract, because each of them has agreed to fulfill his end of the bargain.
Answer:
Judgment will be for Larson. Although a decision by the majority of the partners in a partnership will control in matters concerning the ordinary operations of the firm business, such a decision is not binding if it contravenes the partnership agreement. In this case, the agreement provided that the partners would share profits equally. The decision by Rundles and Kreiger is therefore not effective, since is not based on the unanimous consent of all partners.
