Answer:
As mayor, Ivan Allen Jr. worked to integrate Atlanta’s
✔ fire department
.
He also removed signs relating to segregation from
✔ the city hall building
.
Allen invested in the city’s infrastructure by establishing new
✔ rail and subway lines
.
Another big contribution that he made to the city was creating
✔ the Memorial Arts Center
.
Explanation:
I got it right lol <3
Answer:
Seriously??? Since the other person was NO help, here's what I put :>
Explanation:
1. To understand what they are dealing with.
2. To be able to handle themselves properly.
3. To be able to defend themself if / when needed.
Answer:
Elections affect the Supreme Court like this:
When a president is elected in the US, they are most likely to be of one political party or another. The president also appoints a Supreme Court Justice. If a president is considering appointing a judge, they will probably appoint someone who shares their views, so as to sway matters that get taken to the Supreme Court in their favor.
Explanation:
Example, because I'm not sure I explained correctly: If a president is more left-leaning, they can (and probably will) appoint a left-leaning judge, so that they will judge matters as they or their political party would judge them. Appointing a judge with whom you disagree with isn't a strategic idea, because the president's ideals may be very different from a right-leaning judge. t-leaning, they can (and probably will) appoint a left-leaning judge, so that they will judge matters as they or their political party would judge them. Appointing a judge with whom you disagree isn't a strategic idea, because the president's ideals may be very different from a right-leaning judge.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. A judge could throw out the teen's confession unless the officer complies with the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona.
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona is a ruling of the United States Supreme Court from 1966. The case established the current practice whereby a suspect is required to read his or her rights (the so-called Miranda rights) without exception, which state the right to before a preliminary investigation of the suspect has begun.
That was the decision in Ernesto Miranda's trial. Miranda was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping and sexual assault of an 18-year-old girl on prima facie evidence. After two hours of questioning, Miranda signed the confession. However, he had never been informed of the possibility of meeting a legal adviser or of being silent, and that his confession could not be used against him. During the trial, Miranda's attorney, Alvin Moore, argued that confession would therefore not apply in court. Moore's objection was rejected and Miranda was sentenced to a lengthy prison sentence. The Arizona Supreme Court also upheld the ruling.
The United States Supreme Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, ruled that, due to the Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, no confession would be valid unless the suspect was informed of his rights. The Fifth Amendment states that no one can be compelled to testify against himself and the Sixth Addendum secures access to a lawyer. Ernesto Miranda's judgment was overturned, but he was later sentenced to prison for the same case, based on other evidence.
Answer:
know morphological rules.
Explanation:
Morphological rules -
Morphology simply refers to the study of words , formation of words and the link between the words , is referred to as Morphology.
Morphological rules consists of the rules , which are responsible to make a proper word and sentence.
As the child grows , he tries to adapt to the morphological rules in order to learn new words and make sentences .
Hence, from the given scenario of the question,
The correct term is Morphological rules .
