Answer: Situation specificity
Explanation:
As a person grows, he often understands the behaviors and forms of expression that he must adopt. It is understood that there are ways to behave according to the situation in which the person can be present.
It can be called situation specificity the way a person acts and express itself according to the context in which the person can meet. It is easy for adults the codes established at the time of expressing and behaving according to the place. For children, this is more difficult since their little reason does not allow them to identify at what time they should not cry or play. This is normal since they have not yet reached the stage of maturation that allows them to differentiate at what time they should do something or not, and also that their poor vocabulary makes them express their needs in another way.
In the case of Ari, it can be seen that he behaved as expected according to the context. When he was at the Dean’s office, Ari remained calm and polite. I knew the Dean’s office was not a place to be talking loudly or shouting. Then when he went to a soccer game, Ari started screaming and jumping, something that is expected when a person goes to watch a game of any sport. It is normal to shout, clap, jump and celebrate when you are watching a sport.
Not all people will be able to act and express in certain ways depending on the context and this would not necessarily be because they do not know the ways of behaving. Some mental or physical illnesses can influence a person's behavior, causing them to behave in a way that they do not expect.
Predominately the Colony of Virginia or other Southern Colonies.
This technique is known as Foot-in-the-door phenomenon.
Foot-in-the-door phenomenon is a way of having a person to furnish or follow a big request with the aid of using to begin with making small or modest requests.
The approach is primarily based totally at the good judgment that if a respondent (the individual being requested) can furnish an preliminary small or modest request, then the respondent might be maximum probable to later furnish a bigger request that he/she (the respondent) might now no longer have granted if requested outright (with out being approached with small requests first).
To learn more about foot-in-the-door phenomenon, click here:
brainly.com/question/15745551
#SPJ4
Debbie ryan cameron boyce
Answer:
I think C but I could be wrong.
Explanation:
