According to ross, how can we know what to do when two prima facie duties conflict?

Social Studies

1 answer:

Katyanochek1 [597]2 years ago

4 0

Ross contends that when two prima facie duties conflict, we are unable to decide what to do.

More about prima facie duties:

Ross claims that a prima facie duties is a morally important aspect of an act that may be superseded by other similar aspects.

Prima facie is a Latin phrase that means "on the first appearance" or "based on the initial impression," according to popular usage. Depending on the circumstances, Ross defines a prima facie duties as one that is binding or obligatory.

Ross was a notable proponent of the moral plurality hypothesis or intuitionism. The theory contends there are moral truths that are self-evident and that good is unknowable.

Learn more about prima facie duties here:

brainly.com/question/28275044

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

Match each task or characteristic to whether it is reserved for the Senate, the House of Representatives, or both chambers.

Shalnov [3]

House of Representatives and Senate , approval of both are required to enact laws.

<h3><u>Who is a Senate?</u></h3>

The Constitution, laws pertaining to the status, powers, institutions, and funding of the federated entities (the Regions and Communities), laws governing intrafederal cooperation, conflicts of competence, conflicts of interest, as well as the exercise of the right to substitution, laws pertaining to the Constitutional Court, the Council of State, and laws pertaining to the Council of Federal Agencies are the main topics covered by the legislative authority of the Senate.

Other authorities still remain with the Senate. These responsibilities include handling written inquiries, nominating or appointing senior judges for the Constitutional Court, Council of State, and High Council for Justice, resolving conflicts of interest, working with other parliamentary bodies, and conducting subsidiarity checks.

Therefore, the correct match is as follows: