A negotiation is a Discusion aimed at reaching an agreement. B.
Answer:
$12.40
Explanation:
Activity Estimated Indirect Allocation Base Estimated Q. of
Activity Costs Allocation Base
<u>Materials handling $7,700 Number of parts 7,350 parts </u>
<u>Assembling $10,500 Number of parts 7,350 parts </u>
Packaging $2,410 Number of units 1,470 bookshelves
The direct materials cost per bookshelf is $39. What is the cost of materials handling and assembling per bookshelf?
materials handling cost per part = $7,700 / 7,350 parts = $1.05
assembling cost per part = $10,500 / 7,350 parts = $1.43
total cost per part = $2.48
cost per bookshelf = 5 x $2.48 = $12.40
Answer:
<u><em>But where do we go from here? </em></u>
It depends on the result of more government intervention on quality life standards.
<u><em>Do we need less or more government involvement? </em></u>
It depends on the problems that need to be addressed. For example, to address problems such inequality it is mandatory that the government gets involve and create laws to prevent it. But surely for more movement of capitals there is no need of higher government involvement.
<u><em>Is it a question of the quality of that involvement? </em></u>
Yes. If government has an effective involvement there is even desirable to have its intervention but if it complicates everything then is repeled.
<u><em>Could it be smarter rather than just less? </em></u>
Yes, because it is proved that the economy acts in an effective way to good policy making.
<u><em>How can the cost of government involvement decrease?</em></u>
In this aspect it is important to mention the environmental issues in nowadasy economy. If the measurement of what is defined as "cost" is understand in the long run as conservation and balance between nature and economic explotation of resources.
Answer:
$280
Explanation:
SUTA is a synonym for State Unemployment Tax paid by employers and employees , and used by the government to provide the insurance expenditures for the unemployed citizens
The reciprocal arrangement exempts the tax payer from his former country of work. H e will be taxed in the new country of work at the applicable rate
SUTA ceiling earning = $7000
SUTA rate = 4.0%
SUTA = $280
This can indicate fraud, duress, or undue influence.
In contracts, "consideration" is the things of value each side gives up in an exchange. So if one side gives $1 for a cup of coffee, that might be ok. Now, consider if the contract was to sell your entire house for $1! That would be a shockingly inadequate exchange because even the cheapest home is worth way more than $1.
In that case, the judge might look at <em><u>why</u></em> someone would be willing to give up so much for so little. Were they falsely told there home was worth nothing or maybe told that they would get $1 upfront and more later? That would be <u>fraud</u>. Were they told to sign the contract with a gun pointed at their head? That is an example of <u>duress</u>. Finally, did the person helping them with the contract have undue influence? If your boss, parent, or favorite celebrity advises you to do something that you don't want to do, but you worry about what they will thing if you don't, then you were a victim of their <u>undue influence. </u>
