1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tangare [24]
2 years ago
8

What is the best conclusion that can be drawn about gilgamesh’s character from this excerpt? he prides himself on his triumphs

in battle. he believes in the power of teamwork. he relies on supernatural forces to save him. he demonstrates bravery and takes risks
Social Studies
2 answers:
ivanzaharov [21]2 years ago
6 0

He demonstrates bravery and takes risks is the best conclusion that can be drawn about Gilgamesh's character from this excerpt.

In the excerpt, the statement "Gilgamesh saw it, he leaped upon him, or he held a knife to Humbaba's throat” is a particular statement that is the best which paraphrases relevant evidence to support the statement of conclusion that Gilgamesh demonstrates his bravery and will power to takes risks. Despite the condition of his fear, we can see Gilgamesh charging boldly at Humbaba. Gilgamesh retreats a fearful attitude whenever at the sight of Humbaba's face.

As not concerned about his momentary horror at seeing the dreadful face of Humbaba, Gilgamesh tends to overcome his fear from his companion with utmost encouragement.

In general, the best conclusion that can be drawn according to the excerpt is the willingness to take risks and the brave character of Gilgamesh.

Learn to know more about the excerpt of Gilgamesh and the best conclusion of his character on

brainly.com/question/10271774

#SPJ4

Stolb23 [73]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

D. He demonstrates bravery and takes risks.

Explanation:

found answer elsewhere

You might be interested in
provide a detailed description of the situations that oscar pistorius. caster semenya and itumeleng khune they faced that were n
Misha Larkins [42]
<span>These three personalities were negatively abused/exploited in social media. Oscar Pistorius was accused in social media that He killed His wife. His reputation was destroyed by the netizens giving false accusations towards Him.  For Caster Semanya’s case, her gender was questioned by foreign media and has a great effect on the athlete’s record. While the fans of Itumeleng Khune bashed the athlete through social media by failing to stop penalties in the Nedbank Cup. This situation lead to negative comments and anger from people arise.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Those who argue that justices should be willing to step in and overturn laws when they see a need to are described as supporting
Tems11 [23]

It should be noted that the people who argue that justices should be willing to overturn laws are known to be supporting judicial activism.

Judicial activism simply refers to the practice in the judiciary of protecting the individual rights of an individual through the decisions that depart from the precedents that are already established.

It's about the willingness of a judge to be able to strike down another governmental branch or overturn a judicial precedent. They enforce their own views regarding constitutional requirements.

Learn more about justice on:

brainly.com/question/25756666

5 0
3 years ago
In contrast to bentham, kant thinks this is the most important human characteristic
dimaraw [331]
Kant's view is that Reason is the most important human characteristic. 
4 0
3 years ago
Help please!social studies
ziro4ka [17]

It's answer choice (a.)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If an environmental group wanted to prevent the habitat destruction of the Wyoming pocket​ gopher, the Coase theorem would direc
MaRussiya [10]

Answer:

The correct answer is B.bargain in order to obtain the property rights of the gopher habitat.

Explanation:

In economics, the Coase Theorem states that in a market where transaction costs are negligible, a dispute between parties where property rights are involved will lead to a bargaining process where the party that gives the most value to whatever it's in dispute will end up winning rights over that property. In this case, the environmental group assigns great value to protecting the habitat of the Wyoming pocker gopher, but they can only fully secure its well-being by securing property rights over said habitat, and given their standing, they can expect to bargain or negotiate successfully. Any other option, like protesting, boycotting, or lobbying, won't be good enough to achieve their goals.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A belief in the social, political, and economic equality of the sexes is called:
    15·1 answer
  • Suppose that Torres-Porras decides to perform a second study where he will survey hunters to assess their behavior. He wrote 8 s
    12·1 answer
  • A researcher studying the effect of noise level on concentration randomly assigns student participants to either a noisy room or
    7·1 answer
  • While class systems are based in part on a person's birth, or class of their parents, an important difference between caste and
    8·1 answer
  • Which factor was most important in enabling Russia to fight in World War I for as long as it did?
    11·2 answers
  • A researcher goes to great lengths to ensure that the proportion of males and females in her study matches the proportion of mal
    14·1 answer
  • In Texas, to run as an independent for statewide office, a candidate must file a petition with a number of signatures equal to _
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following leaders was a fascist dictator?
    5·2 answers
  • With how many countries of the world has Nepal maintained friendly nation?​
    5·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of the Electoral College?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!