Question

Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts of McCulloch v. Maryland led to a different holding than the holding in Hammer v. Dagenhart.

Answer 1

The facts of McCulloch v. Maryland led to a different holding than that of Hammer v. Dagenhart because it involved preventing states from taxing the Federal government.

What is Taxation?

This is defined as a compulsory levy or financial charge which is imposed on people so as to serve as a source of revenue thereby funding government spending.  

The McCulloch v. Maryland case was about the Congress attempting to regulate the production of goods while the Hammer v. Dagenhart involved states wanting to tax the federal government via the federal bank.

Read more about Taxation here brainly.com/question/25783927

#SPJ1