1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aleksandr82 [10.1K]
1 year ago
15

Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts of McCulloch v. Maryland led to a different holdi

ng than the holding in Hammer v. Dagenhart.
History
1 answer:
il63 [147K]1 year ago
8 0

The facts of McCulloch v. Maryland led to a different holding than that of Hammer v. Dagenhart because it involved preventing states from taxing the Federal government.

<h3>What is Taxation?</h3>

This is defined as a compulsory levy or financial charge which is imposed on people so as to serve as a source of revenue thereby funding government spending.  

The McCulloch v. Maryland case was about the Congress attempting to regulate the production of goods while the Hammer v. Dagenhart involved states wanting to tax the federal government via the federal bank.

Read more about Taxation here brainly.com/question/25783927

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
What happend as a result of the so called intolerant acts?
iren [92.7K]
C.The port of Boston was closed.
5 0
3 years ago
Scarcity is the basic economic because
Mamont248 [21]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Which of the following casts the final and official vote to elect the President? A. Electoral College B. Congress C. Individual
san4es73 [151]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were slaves transported to the new world from Africa?
Irina-Kira [14]

Slave ships were large cargo ships specially converted for the purpose of transporting slaves. ... As many as 20 million Africans were transported by ship. The transportation of slaves from Africa to America was known as the Middle Passage.

5 0
3 years ago
In a paragraph of 125+ words, explain why things following World War II were far from "normal," even though people wanted a retu
suter [353]
The war effected many people. Many people died, most resources, if not all, went to the war. After the war, many people wanted to be normal again but could not. The war had effected the economy, people's lives, and some political views. A lot of people had a hard time with getting jobs or money and a lot of families were devastated by the war. Not only normal people were effected, also countries as a whole. The relations between communist countries, such as the Soviet Union, and non-communist countries, such as America, stayed tense. Even until this day, these countries have issues and a third world war is somewhere in the back of our minds'. The Cold War began after World War 2 and it did not end until the late twentieth century.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain how the transcontinental railroad intensified the slavery issue
    11·1 answer
  • Which new consumer product led to the growth of suburbs outside of cities in South Carolina
    14·2 answers
  • Why are rivers and waterfalls important to the northeast region
    10·1 answer
  • Text of Gettysburg Address
    11·1 answer
  • How did the spread of Buddhism in the east compare to the spread of Christianity in the west?
    12·1 answer
  • In paragraph 3, the author states t
    9·1 answer
  • कुल प्रशन 15 प्रत्येक 2 अंक का हैं
    15·1 answer
  • #19-Which is not a factor that led to the American Victory in the<br> Revolutionary War?
    13·1 answer
  • What does Gdp measure, and what are the four components of gdp?​
    9·1 answer
  • Can someone plz help me? :(
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!