Answer:
<em>c. The reasoning of both Alfons and Mary suffers from the omitted variable problem</em>
Explanation:
The issue of omitted variables occurs as a result of mis-specification of a linear regression model, which could be either because the impact of the omitted variable on both the dependent variable is unclear, or the evidence was not accessible.
This causes you to omit the variable from your regression, resulting in over-estimation (upward bias) or underestimation (downward) of the influence of one of the other predictor variables.
Answer: The efficient outcome is to have the security system installed. After the meeting the security system will <em><u>be installed</u></em>, which illustrates the <em><u>free rider problem.</u></em>
Free rider is the burden on resource which is been shared, the problem is created by its usage or over-exploitation by individual who aren't paying their fair share.
∴ Here Tom is a free rider. i.e. He is willing to pay $100 where he should've paid $250.
Answer:
hedonic Theory of Wages:
Accept just two kinds of occupations in the work showcase (safe employments versus unsafe occupations). Under this, sheltered employments have likelihood of zero that specialist gets harmed. Unsafe occupations have likelihood of 1 and laborers know this. Laborers care about whether their occupations are sheltered or hazardous.
Laborers expand utility by picking wage-chance blends that offer them the best measure of utility. Expect laborers disdain hazard, yet to various degrees, for example they have diverse ideal pay chance blends. Firms are on their isoprofit bends that give the hazard wage mixes that give zero (financial) benefit. They vary between firms. An indulgent pay work mirror the connection among wages and occupation qualities. It matches laborers with various hazard inclinations with firms that can give employments that coordinate these diverse hazard inclinations.
Apathy bends uncover the exchange offs that a laborer favors among wages and level of hazard (chance thought to be an 'awful'). To give a similar utility, dangerous occupations must compensation higher wages than safe employments. The more prominent the laborer's aversion for hazard, the more prominent the pay off required for changing from a safe to an unsafe activity, and the more noteworthy the booking cost. As the pay firms bring to the table for hazardous occupations increments, less firms will extend to dangerous employment opportunities and bringing about a descending slanting interest bend as it turns out to be increasingly productive for firms to make occupations spare than to pay the higher compensation.
Suppositions of Differential Wage Theory are:
- The compensation differential is sure. Hazardous employments pay more than spare occupations.
- The balance wage differential is that of the last laborer employed (the peripheral specialist). It's anything but a proportion of the normal abhorrence for chance among laborers in the work showcase.
- Along these lines, everything except the minimal specialist are overcompensated by the market.
On the off chance that a few specialists like to work in dangerous occupations (they are eager to pay for the option to be harmed) and if the interest for such laborers is little, the market repaying differential is negative. At point P, where supply rises to request, laborers utilized in unsafe occupations acquire not as much as laborers utilized in safe employments. The outline given beneath shows the circumstance:
Isoprofit Curve:
As it is exorbitant to create well-being, a firm contribution hazard level P* can make the working environment more secure for example move left on flat pivot, just on the off chance that it diminishes compensation while keeping benefits consistent, so that the iso-benefit bend is upward slanting. Higher isoprofit bend returns lower benefit.
Answer:
$166,000
Explanation:
The net cash flow from operating activities using the indirect method is computed below:
Cash flow from Operating activities - Indirect method
Net income $175,000
Adjustment made:
Add : Depreciation expense $28,000
Less: Increase in accounts receivable -$16,000
Less: Decrease in accounts payable -$21,000
Total of Adjustments -$9,000
Net Cash flow from Operating activities $166,000
Answer:
d) 15 dias
Explanation:
O Ciclo Financeiro, ou Ciclo de Caixa, é o tempo entre a saída de pagamentos (no caso fornecedores) e a entrada de recebimentos (vendas por exemplo).
Digamos que estamos em janeiro, começando o ano. A empresa em questão compra sua matéria prima no dia 1 com prazo de pagamento de 15 (pagar dia 15 de janeiro).
A empresa leva 10 dias para fabricar o produto final, o vendendo no dia 10 de janeiro. Ela vende, porém, recebendo somente 20 dias depois, dia 30 de janeiro.
Ela tem que pagar o fornecedor dia 15 de janeiro e recebe pela venda 30 de janeiro.
Assim, a empresa tem 15 dias entre ter que pagar pela matéria prima e receber pela venda do produto proveniente da mesma, constituindo assim o ciclo financeiro de 15 dias.