Im pretty sure that it is d
Answer: the doctrine of unconscionability
Explanation:
The doctrine of unconscionability is a defense that is against enforcing a contract. From the question, we are informed that Orlin bought a refrigerator, on credit, from a salesman and the salesman want him to pay 10 times the worth of the refrigerator.
In this scenario, the contract is deemed to be unfair and also oppressive to Orlin, thus he a find it unconscionable and therefore he can refuse to enforce it. Therefore, if he wants to challenge the contract’s terms, the doctrine of unconscionability will be used.
Answer:i dont answer
Explanation:alot of sbhbb b cn n ncn nc nccnx n c zcx nzv zxcv zcv cvzcv zxcbzv CVzxv z xcvzxcv xczv zcvzxcv zxcvzxcv zxcv xzcv zxcvzxcv zcvz cvxcvzxcv zcvxzcv zxvczxcv zx v v v v v zxc v zxcv zc xv zxcv zxcvzxcv zxc zxcv zcv zxcvz xv zxv xc vxcnvcnxv xz v nvn cx cx c xc xc x xvn.
b nnn nn
The answer is Wireless networks
The answer would be that there are few other places to purchase soda on campus; competition (or lack thereof) can play a big factor in determining price elasticity.
While nutrition information can shift consumers' preferences, we have no indication within the question of whether or not the students are well-informed of the impact of their drinking choices.
As for the third option, we are not given any information on the students' budgets, and no information with which to infer this, either. We only have information on their spending as it is related to soda, not as compared to other purchases.
Finally, given that the quantity sold does not change much despite the change in price, we can conclude that this price curve is relatively inelastic, in which case the price elasticity of demand would be closer to zero than one. This effectively rules out the last answer.
