How did skilled artisans contribute to the successes of the Ming dynasty?

2 answers:

7 0

The correct answer is "The artisans produced silk and porcelain goods that demanded high prices, thus increasing China’s trade and wealth.". The skilled artisans of the Ming dynasty produced silk and porcelain goods that were sold at high prices, which represented not only the value of the goods itself but a symbolic value because of the representation of China's culture. The selling of these goods benefited China’s trade and wealth, and even nowadays, these goods are considered of high value.

Kruka [31]3 years ago

3 0

The best option from the list would be that "<span>The artisans produced silk and porcelain goods that demanded high prices, thus increasing China’s trade and wealth," since these items were in high demand, especially in Europe. </span>

You might be interested in

Select the correct answer.

Zepler [3.9K]

D. Tinker field

It was named after Major General Clarence Leonard Tinker.

8 0

3 years ago

what is a public good that is provided by only the federal government by the collection of revenue A) Parks B) museums C) airpor

Naddik [55]

Answer:the answer is D

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

What was the primary cause of the Great Depression?

Nimfa-mama [501]

Stock market crash is the correct answer

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The Song China civil service exam was a way to get a job in _____.

yan [13]

The answer would be B.

8 0

3 years ago

why are individual rights important to a democratic society in wartime? Why are there some limits on these rights?

ExtremeBDS [4]

There have always been conflicts between individual rights and national security interests in democracies. Limits on civil liberties during wartime, including restrictions on free speech, public assembly, and mass detentions, have been the most serious threats to individual freedom. Even in peacetime, counter-terrorist measures including profiling, detention, and exclusion, along with the use of national identification cards, have raised concerns about racism, constitutional violations, and the loss of privacy. With the passage of new anti-terrorist laws after September 11, 2001, these tensions have increased. Supporters of broader governmental powers insist that they are part of the increased security measures necessary to safeguard national security. In contrast, many civil rights groups fear that the infringement upon individual rights is another step in the erosion of democratic civil society.

Wartime measures. The severest restrictions on civil liberties have occurred in times of war. In September 1862, during the American Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln (1809–1865) suspended the right of habeas corpus in order to allow federal authorities to arrest and detain suspected Confederate sympathizers without arrest warrants or speedy trials. Well aware of the drastic nature of such a step, Lincoln justified it as a necessary wartime measure. After the United States Supreme Court found Lincoln's abrogation of habeas corpus an unconstitutional intrusion on Congressional authority, Congress itself ratified the measure by passing the Habeas Corpus Act in September 1863. Through 1864, about 14,000 people were arrested under the act; about one in seven were detained at length in federal prisons, most on allegations of offering aid to the Confederacy but others on corruption and fraud charges.

Read more: http://www.faqs.org/espionage/In-Int/Intelligence-and-Democracy-Issues-and-Conflicts.html#ixzz4XX37pHRv

4 0

3 years ago