1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
son4ous [18]
2 years ago
9

When a curve shifts, the underlying relationship between the two variables has changed.

Social Studies
1 answer:
emmainna [20.7K]2 years ago
8 0

If a curve shifts, the underlying relationship between the two variables has changed is a true statement.

<h3>What has to happen for a curve to shift?</h3>

A shift in the demand curve is known to be a term that connote if a determinant of demand other than price are altered.

It is known to be a term that takes place if the demand for goods and services are known to changes even if the price did not change.

Hence, If a curve shifts, the underlying relationship between the two variables has changed is a true statement.

Learn more about variables from

brainly.com/question/25223322

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
The ______ clause of the First Amendment bans the state from helping religious institutions, whereas the ______ clause bans the
zheka24 [161]

Answer:

Establishment clause;

Free exercise cause

Explanation:

The Establishment and the free exercise clause are two two provisions concerning religion.

The Establishment clause prohibits the government from establishing a church that is the government can't sponsor any church while the Free Exercise Clause protects citizens' right to practice their religion as they please, so long as the practice does not run afoul of a "public morals" or a "compelling" governmental interest.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
20 POINTS BRAINLIST HELP PLEASE
Volgvan

Answer:

D. Alma would vote no because she said, "They don't have enough income to pay a child-care provider."

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Why did the Hawaiian parliament shifted in favor of U.S. annexation?
loris [4]

<span><span>In the early weeks of the administration of President Benjamin Harrison (1889-1893), the U.S. minister to Hawaii, Henry Carter, drafted a free-trade treaty with Hawaii.  The treaty intended to transform the island nation into an American protectorate:  the United States would guarantee Hawaii’s independence at the price of American veto power over treaties Hawaii negotiated with other countries and American military authority over internal or external threats.  When a rebellion broke out in July 1889, Harrison ordered 70 marines to land and restore order in Hawaii, and thereafter stationed an American naval vessel off the Hawaiian coast.  The next year, the McKinley Tariff removed the trade advantage of Hawaii sugar producers, who relied overwhelmingly on American markets, by putting sugar on the duty-free list and granting a bounty to American sugar growers. The Hawaiian economy dropped into a depression, and as a result, white sugar growers favored establishment of an American protectorate or outright annexation.  Their plans were thwarted when Queen Liliuokalani, supported by Hawaiian nationalists, ascended the throne in January 1891.</span><span>The February 1892 elections in Hawaii resulted in a virtual deadlock between three parties.  Soon afterward, the new U.S. minister, John L. Stevens, requested instructions on how to react should rebels, who had consulted with him, overthrow the monarchy to establish a republic.  In May, Lorrin Thurston, a Hawaiian legislator and member of the secret Annexation Club, arrived in Washington, D.C., to lobby the Harrison administration to support a republican revolution.  He met with Secretary of State James Blaine and Navy Secretary Benjamin Tracy, but was not allowed to see the president.  In his final annual message to Congress in December 1892, Harrison endorsed development of the Pearl Harbor naval base and the laying of a telegraph cable to Hawaii.</span><span>The Hawaiian cabinet resigned on January 12, 1893.  Two days later, the queen announced a new constitution reasserting monarchical powers, and the Annexation Club moved to create a provisional government.  On January 16, Stevens ordered the 165-man U.S.S. Boston to land, ostensibly to protect the American mission.  The next day the rebels proclaimed a republic headed by Judge Stanford Dole, a wealthy planter.  The strategic placement of the American troops proved instrumental in preventing the royal forces from effectively responding to the coup.  On his own authority, Stevens recognized the new Hawaiian government, proclaimed it an American protectorate, and ordered the American flag flown on all government buildings. </span><span>Less than a month later, the new Hawaiian government had drafted and passed an annexation treaty, which it sent to the outgoing Harrison administration. After receiving assurances from U.S. ministers in France, Great Britain, and Russia that those nations would not protest, the Harrison administration signed the annexation treaty on February 14 and forwarded it to the Senate.  Harrison warned that annexation would prevent Hawaii from falling under the control of another great power, which would threaten American interests and security.  However, there was not enough support in the outgoing Republican-controlled Senate for the two-thirds vote required for ratification, and the incoming Democratic Senate would certainly defeat it. </span><span>On March 9, the new president, Democrat Grover Cleveland, withdrew the treaty and appointed a committee to investigate American involvement in the bloodless Hawaiian coup.  The report, released on July 25, harshly criticized Stevens’s role in the rebellion, argued that most native Hawaiians did not favor annexation, and suggested that the annexationists were acting out of economic self-interest.  The Cleveland administration requested that Dole and the provisional government abdicate, and that the queen grant them amnesty and recognize their acts while in office.  Both sides resisted, and in his December 1893 message to Congress, Cleveland handed the dilemma to them.  After extensive hearings, and the rejection of various proposals, Congress decided to leave the situation as it existed with the minority government in power and Hawaii independent.</span><span>In March 1897, William McKinley, the new Republican president, met with his advisors to discuss whether it was preferable to annex Hawaii by treaty or congressional resolution.  In April, the Hawaiian minister to the U.S. officially requested that the McKinley administration begin negotiations on an annexation treaty.  Around the same time, the Republican-controlled Senate was preparing to prohibit Hawaiian sugar from the American market.  On June 16, President McKinley sent an annexation treaty to the Senate, stating that the annexation of Hawaii by the United States was only a matter of time.  Although most Republicans supported the treaty, Southern Democrats looked upon it with disfavor for reasons of economics (sugar interests</span><span>Robert C. Kennedy</span></span>
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was the home to early American
zalisa [80]

Answer:

ETOWAH INDIAN MOUNDS

Explantation:

This is the most intact Mississippian Culture site in the Southeastern United States.

4 0
4 years ago
Will give brainliest to correct answer: Why is it particularly challenging to study bias and point of views in world history?
sashaice [31]

Answer:

Regardless of whether they are conscious or learned implicitly within cultural contexts, biases have been part of historical investigation since the ancient beginnings of the discipline. As such, history provides an excellent example of how biases change, evolve, and even disappear.

Early attempts to make history an empirical, objective discipline (most notably by Voltaire) did not find many followers. Throughout the 18th and 19th centuries, European historians only strengthened their biases. As Europe gradually dominated the world through the self-imposed mission to colonize nearly all the other continents, Eurocentrism prevailed in history.

Even within the Eurocentric perspective, not all Europeans were equal; Western historians largely ignored aspects of history, such as class, gender, or ethnicity. Until the rapid development of social history in the 1960s and 1970s, mainstream Western historical narratives focused on political and military history, while cultural or social history was written mostly from the perspective of the elites.

The biased approach to history-writing transferred also to history-teaching. From the origins of national mass schooling systems in the 19th century, the teaching of history to promote national sentiment has been a high priority. History textbooks in most countries have been tools to foster nationalism and patriotism and to promote the most favorable version of national history.

Germany attempts to be an example of how to remove nationalistic narratives from history education. The history curriculum in Germany is characterized by a transnational perspective that emphasizes the all-European heritage, minimizes the idea of national pride, and fosters the notion of civil society centered on democracy, human rights, and peace.

Despite progress and increased focus on groups that have been traditionally excluded from mainstream historical narratives (people of color, women, the working class, the poor, the disabled, LGBTQI-identified people, etc.), bias remains a component of historical investigation.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 13th Amendment (1865)-Abolition of Slavery 14th Amendment (1866)-Definition of Citizenship; Due Process 15th Amendment (1869)-Ri
    9·2 answers
  • Although josh learned aggressive behaviors by watching a violent movie, he did not imitate those behaviors until days later, whe
    14·1 answer
  • Examples of economy in canada
    12·2 answers
  • Describe how parties are organized at the state level
    11·1 answer
  • List continents in order of land size, largest to smallest
    5·2 answers
  • This was a famous dramatic loss of value in the shares of stock in corporations that hit the U.S. in 1929.
    10·1 answer
  • Select A for Allies in World War I. Select C for Central Powers in World War I. Great Britain France Germany United States Russi
    7·2 answers
  • Which statement best explains how geography contributed to t
    11·2 answers
  • . During the 1700s, the percentage of Europeans living in towns or cities was about
    5·2 answers
  • If TV viewing initially decreases with age, but then after age 40 reverses itself, this correlation would be an example of:
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!