Answer:
Option a (unintended side-effects) is the right alternative.
Explanation:
- A cost, as well as benefit occasioned by such a production company that would not be economically accumulated rather than started receiving by this same producer, seems to be an environmental problem.
- An externality could be either favorable or unfavorable and therefore can occur whether from the development or use of a particular product. The expenses and rewards may be confidential to a person or an organization, or social, which means that society as a whole should be influenced.
Some other options are given aren't connected to the conclusions reached. So, the obvious response here is just the right one.
Answer:
Answer is Option B: that she was under undo duress from her son and daughter-in-law and that the agreement is voidable.
Explanation:
When the broker came to offer Mrs. G, the price he offered was quite less than what she was asking for. Still his son and his wife urged her to sign the offer. So, later she can claim that she was under a lot of threat and violence from her son and daughter-in-law to sign the offer and it would make the agreement voidable.
She cannot claim about Broker's offering less price, as per Option A. Neither she can say that Broker defrauded them, as per Option C. Option D is also incorrect as it says that her consumer rights were taken illegally by her son and his wife.
Answer: A modulator-demodulator, or simply a modem, is a hardware device that converts data from a digital format, intended for communication directly between devices with specialized wiring, into one suitable for a transmission medium such as telephone lines or radio
Explanation: is this what you’re talking about? If not the please clarify for me so I can give u the correct answer.
