Answer:
The pandemic has caused the largest and fastest decline in international flows — including trade, foreign direct investment, and international travel — in modern history. While these numbers imply a major rollback of globalization’s recent gains, they don’t necessarily signal a fundamental collapse of international market integration. But how deep will the plunge really be? How fast can we expect global flows to rebound? And how might future flow patterns look different from the past? Leaders can find clues about the future and actionable implications for their companies by focusing on five key drivers of globalization’s trajectory: 1) global growth patterns; 2) supply-chain policies; 3) superpower frictions and fragility; 4) ongoing technical shifts; and 5) my opinion
Explanation:
Answer:
Implicit prejudice; explicit prejudice.
Explanation:
As the exercise explains, both of this cases of prejudice involves negative attitudes against a certain individual, person, group, etc. In the first case, the implicit, the attitude is not openly talked, verbalized; it's unspoken. But, in the second case, the explicit prejudice involves the awareness of hatred or negative attitude of the individual. So, overall, in the first case the person is not completely aware of the thoughts, attitude or feelings, but on the second case it is completely.
Yellow River to the north and the Yangtze<span> to the south,</span>
Answer:
1) This situation is out of the standard set by Tarasoff decision’s duty to protect because the situation is severe and Dr. Yeung should not rely on probability. This could be possible that Aiden was trying to threaten Dr. Yeung and demanding no interference in his personal life. Dr. Yeung is a health psychologist but as a psychologist, she could understand the seriousness of the situation so she must call the professional support. Dr. Yeung should refer this case to the clinical psychologist and provide support to them about the health and behavior conditions.
2) Ethically, Dr. Yeung’s decision may affect the research purpose but morally her decision may help a person who needs it. The decision of Dr. Yeung was exceptional so it must be considered as an exceptional condition.
3) Dr. Yeung should consult the clinical psychologist and psychiatrists before handling this type of case. Dr. Yeung was not assigned to handle abnormal behavior problems and therapies, she could have handled the situation as an exceptional condition and with the help of team support.
4) Dr. Yeung should consider this case as health and abnormal behavior problem rather than a general condition. The behavior of Aiden was destructive and it should be analyzed with the help of security agencies, medical practitioner, psychologist and psychiatric. Dr. Yeung tried to done her job well but her lack of experience could have threaten her and patient’s life. I think, Dr. Yeung should demand professional help and experienced services.
Answer: C The Bill of Rights was a response to Americans' concerns about the powers of
government
Explanation:
When people thought the U.S. central government was getting too strong they wanted a bill of rights to be added to the U.S. Constitution. They protested that they would not ratify the constitution unless they could get the Bill of Rights on the side.
