Answer:
Forensic psychologists, that is psychologists that specialize in psychological evaluation and treatment, especially in legal cases have become commonplace in death penalty cases ever since the Supreme Court ruled that capital sentencing must be based on the individual offense and the perpetrator of the crime. What this means, in essence, is that psychological factors among others must be considered as it could possibly influence jury decision.
The importance of forensic psychologists in the death penalty was greatly highlighted after the Supreme Court decided in 2002 that the use of the death penalty for mentally unstable people was unconstitutional. If an accused is deemed mentally unfit by a psychologist, such a person cannot face the death sentence. This goes on to underline the importance of the psychologists' assessments in death penalty cases.
This is FALSE. I say this because a hypothesis is a statement which is not universally true. More research has to be carried out for it to become a law. Which is a proven fact. Hope i helped. Have a nice day.
Hi! Do you have answer choices? Or do you have to create your own answer(s)?
Tax rates are set by the <u>board of supervisors</u> and tax notices are sent out by the <u>county recorder.</u>
<h3>Who sets the county tax rates?</h3>
It is common for the tax rates in a county to be set by the Board of Supervisors after taking into account, the needs of the county.
The new tax rates would then be sent out as tax notices to people in the county by county recorders.
In conclusion, option B is correct.
Find out more on county board of supervisors at brainly.com/question/13546836
#SPJ1
Answer:
This is not plagiarism
Explanation:
In research, the term plagiarism refers to the fact of taking someone else's ideas or concepts and use them as if they were one's own. In other words, when writing a paper, we use someone else's work and we don't quote the original authors and it seems as if the words were ours.
In this example, <u>the student quoted the original author of the paper and used one of his quotes in his work but he did give the author credit and he didn't make it seem as if the words were the student's own words. </u>Therefore, this doesn't classify as plagiarism.
