Ask question

Ask question

All categories

11 months ago

15

PRACTICE

1 answer:

Leviafan [203]11 months ago

8 0

Answers are:

16.
-1 - (-4) = 3

17.
-1-1/3 - (-4) = 2-2/3

18.
2 - (-1) = 3

19.
3-1/2 - (-1) = 4-1/2

20.
3-1/2 - 2 .= 1-1/2

21.
3-1/2 - (-1-1/3) = 4-5/6

Step by step: I took one point and subtracted the second point to get the length of each segment. You could also look at the ruler and count from one point to the other.

Remember when you subtract a negative, the two negatives become a positive

You might be interested in

How do you graph this inequality on a number line? <br><img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=r%20%5Cleqslant%20%20-%209" id="TexForm

Black_prince [1.1K]

Answer in the attachment.

5 0

2 years ago

Need help i don't understand

BabaBlast [244]

Answer:

Commutative property of multiplication

Step-by-step explanation:

This property states that numbers can be switched around when multiplying and the answer still remains the same

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

PLz help asap CONGRUENCE WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST

Elza [17]

Same idea as last time only the similar angles are 92 and 92. Thus your anwser: 92

8 0

2 years ago

In a topographical map of a city, the vertices of the city limits are A(10,9),B(18,9),C(18,2),D(14,4.5),E(10,4.5). The coordinat

Viefleur [7K]

I think it’s D??????

3 0

2 years ago

decide whether enough information is given to prove that the triangle is congruent using the SAS congruence theorem. if so, writ

Paladinen [302]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

ΔCAD and ΔCBD

∠A ≅∠B (Angle)

AD ≅BD (Side)

From the graph we see that

CD≅CD (Side)

because of reflexive propriety ( a line segment is congruent with itself)

If you put in order those congruencies we have SSA witch does NOT prove congruence.

we not use SAS because the angle between the sides is not congruent

8 0

2 years ago