Question

How has due process been applied to the exclusionary rule in supreme court rulings?

Answer 1

According to the Supreme Court, evidence collected by unlawful search and seizure is unlawful and cannot be used against a person in court since it violates their right to due process.

When the courts place more emphasis on the specific conduct that needs to be regulated rather than the standing of the individual defendant, the goals of the due process exclusionary rule are better served.

The Supreme Court has ruled that evidence obtained through illegal search and seizure is illegal and cannot be used in court against a person because it violates their right to due process.

For instance, the Supreme Court has found that the Due Process Clause safeguards rights like the right to sexual privacy that aren't expressly mentioned in the Constitution.

The rule's objectives are to stop law enforcement officials from carrying out Fourth Amendment-violating searches and seizures and to give defendants who have had their rights violated recourse.

To learn more about Supreme Court refer to:

brainly.com/question/10739091

#SPJ4