The answer is <span>There can be a crime because there was criminal negligence
Basically, every action that unintentionally causes harm to the safety of other people or public property could be considered as criminal negligence
Usually, the punishment for criminal negligence in united states wouldn't surpass more than 2 years of jail time..</span>
Answer:
From a liberal perspective, voter suppression is frowned upon in modern day society. Although when voter suppression is linked to the politicians involvement, evidence must be presented for it which is quite difficult to do since the politicians will try everything in their power to push you down. But if the appropriate evidence is presented then the international law may give severe punishment to the any leader who was responsible for voter suppression.
In my opinion, we the people of the Earth must stand against voter suppression where ever it is occurring. Voter suppression is equivalent to oppression in a way because your voices are being suppressed by the government and this counts as oppression.
That is a quote from George Washington
He believed that a foundation of a good government lies between the unification of people itself.
It's implied in the sentence that the people have more power over the government, not the other way around
It started 476 a.d thats the answer
The direct democracy or pure democracy it´s a form of democracy in which the people directly decides on policy initiatives, it differs from the representative democracy; the one that it´s currently established in the majority of the countries; because in that the people choose the representantives and they are those who decide the policies to carry on. In the representative democracy the people do not govern, it´s a common mistake to mix both concepts.
Two different forms of direct democracy are participatory democracy and deliberative democracy. The deliberative democracy is a form in which the deliberation it´s a central matter to the decisions and it is seen as an amalgalm of the direct and the representative democracies. It holds that for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by an authentic deliberation not a mere voting.
The participatory democracy is one that emphasizes the broad participation of everybody but it demands to the citizens to be more involved in the political participation.
I think that a group taking a vote on something is an example of a participatory democracy because everyone have the same power to create consensus and, at last it would win the iniciative that obtain more votes. If the example was a representative democracy then the group would have to vote for only one person to make a decision and then the group will follow the "leader" choice althought it goes against the majority of what the group wants.
I hope the answer to be useful for you. Regards.
