Answer:
[a]. 10560, [b]. 14160, [c]. 7668.
Explanation:
[a]. In order to be able to solve this particular question we have to consider what is known as LINEAR PROGRAMMING.
We have the assumption that the function to be equals to 10A + 9B. The first step that we need to take here is to find the constraint for the linear programming relaxation which is;
1/2A + 5/6B 
600.
1/10A + 1/4B 135. Thus, A 
0 and B
With the help of excel solver and graphs, that we have the profit at $18 we are going have the value of A =300 and B =420. Therefore, the optimal solution = [300,420].
Thus, we have the objective function value to be = 10,560. [that is 10 * 300 + 420 * 18}.
[b]. For option b, where the profit increases to $20, the optimal solution lies on A =708 and B =0. Hence, objective function value = 14,160[ that is 20 * 708 + 0].
[c]. Here, there is increase in the sewing operation capacity to 750 hours. Therefore, we will have the value of A = 540 and B = 252.
Thus, the objective function value = 7668.
Answer:
convenient, durable, easy
A Non-profit organization survives off of donations, they don't charge anything for their services.
A cooperative organization I believe charges for it's services.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
investments with higher volatility helps in achieving higher returns by the investors and this will helps to boost the the organization morale
It should be noted that Historical evidence on the returns of large portfolios of stock and bonds shows that investments with higher volatility have rewarded investors with higher returns.
<span>If a farmer in georgia who grows peaches has an initial investment in his business of -$1,000,000 and a rental equipment fee of -$100,000 and wages of -$100,000, in one year he spends $1,200,000 in business. In returns he makes $150,000 baskets of peaches which sell for $4 a basket which makes him $600,000 a year. He nets a loss of $600,000 in a year ($-1,200,000+$600,000)
If the interest rate on his savings, had he invested that $1,000,000 he would have had $1,040,000 by the end of the year in his investment account. If you add that to his shoe sales income of $45,000 he would have had $1,095,000 by the end of the first year. If he would have sold shoes instead of growing peaches he would have $1,695,000 more dollars by the end of the first year.</span>
