Answer:
16.30%
Explanation:
Calculation for what the percentage of the company's capital structure consists of debt
Using this formula
rs=D1/P0+g
First step is to find the D1 using this formula
D1=(1+Dividend expected grow constant rate) *+Dividend per share
Let plug in the formula
D1=(1+0.07)*$2.00
D1=1.07*$2.00
D1=$2.14
Now let find the percentage of the company's capital structure Using this formula
rs=D1/P0+g
Let plug in the formula
rs=$2.14/$23.00+0.07
rs=0.09304947+0.07
rs=0.1630*100
rs=16.30%
Therefore the percentage of the company's capital structure consists of debt will be 16.30%
Answer:
Misrepresentation.
Explanation:
In this scenario, on its advertisement, a company claims that it has funds in its possession that are in fact not available for payment of losses or claims. The company is guilty of misrepresentation.
Misrepresentation can be defined as an untrue or misleading statement of fact made by a party to an individual or group of people to deceitfully lure or induce them to go into a contract. A company stating in its advert that it has funds in its possession but in the true sense or actual fact do not have the funds for payment of losses or claims; such a company is engaging in a fraudulent act and is liable to prosecution in any court of competent jurisdiction.
Answer:
a) Portfolio ABC's expected return is 10.66667%
Explanation:
The expected return is based on the risk factor of a project. If a project has higher risk its rate of return will be higher. Portfolio ABC has one third of its funds invested in each stock. The return of on A and B are 20% and 10%. Their beta is 1.0 for both the stocks while stock C has beta 1.4. The portfolio expected return will be 10.66667%.
A settlement made with the aid of using a minor is frequently voidable, however a minor can most effective keep away from a settlement all through his or her minority popularity and for an inexpensive time after he reaches the age of majority. After an inexpensive length of time, the settlement is deemed to be ratified and cannot be avoided.
- Facts of the case: Sean, 17, a snowboarder, signs a long-term endorsement agreement for sportswear. At age 19, he wants to void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the deal at 17.
- Rule of Law: Minor's Contracts are voidable at the option of Minor.
- Analysis: Since, Minor's Contract is voidable at the option of the Minor who Signs the Contact can either honor the contract or void the contract. A minor can void a contract for lack of capacity, only when he is still under the age of majority. If a minor turn 18 i.e., After attaining Majority and hasn't done anything to void the contract, then the contract can no longer be voided.
- Here, Sean has not done anything to void the contract on attaining the age of 18. So, he at the age of 19, cannot void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the agreement at 17.
- Decision: Sean Vs. Sportswear Company: In the light of the above provisions, a Court will not permit Sean to now void the agreement.
Learn more about minority popularity here:
brainly.com/question/14457086
#SPJ4
Answer:
the long-run average total cost curve rises
Explanation
Diseconomies of scale is a situation that comes up due to the growth of a business which leads to increase in cost per unit. It is the cost disadvantage a business accrue as a result of increase in output leading to increase in cost per unit in the production of goods and services. When diseconomies of scale occur, as output rises unit cost falls.
