1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
muminat
3 years ago
15

Difference between legal person and natural person? give any 12 points on chart​

Law
1 answer:
Ann [662]3 years ago
4 0

Natural person refers to a living human being, with certain rights and responsibilities under the law. Legal person, is a group of people that is considered by law to be acting as a single individual. Hope this helps :)

You might be interested in
Which is more important--security or freedom? Why?
weeeeeb [17]

Well I think Security means Freedom the purpose of security is to provide you Freedom.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If Josh throws the baseball 85 meters in 5 seconds, what is the average speed of<br> the baseball?
Komok [63]

Answer:

17

Explanation:

The question is asking for the average speed so you would have to divide distance by time which is 85 divided by 5

3 0
11 months ago
How are civil rights and civil liberties of citizens protected under the bill of rights? ( include 2 examples)
Ivan

Answer:

Civil liberties are protections against government actions. Civil rights, in contrast, refer to positive actions of government should take to create equal conditions for all Americans.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Is he green or red............
Ahat [919]

Answer:

green

Explanation:

why

8 0
3 years ago
The state trial court in nevada issued a decision in which a party was found guilty of fraud. Should a case arise in the future
bija089 [108]

The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:

The state trial court in Nevada has issued a decision in which a party has been found guilty of fraud. Should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada courts will be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision.

Answer:

No, should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada state trial courts will not be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision, because the decisions of trial courts do not use precedents or rulings established in previous legal cases to arrive at decisions on future disputes involving different or entirely new parties.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How has the government tried to make paying for campaigns more fair?​
    9·1 answer
  • Hearing is a process, and listening is<br> a process.
    12·1 answer
  • Why You could speculate that is important for motorists to keep up to date with traffic laws and driving techniques?
    6·1 answer
  • Giving away another brainliest!!
    10·2 answers
  • An investigator takes a photograph that includes a dollar bill as a size reference. This is most likely what type of photograph?
    5·1 answer
  • The three interdependent branches of the U.S. CJS are the courts, the corrections system, and the
    12·2 answers
  • A pedestrian may if there aren't sidewalks
    7·1 answer
  • 1. Under the Obama Administration, what did the Justice Department allow states to do in regards to marijuana?
    15·1 answer
  • How long does it take to clean a school
    6·1 answer
  • What are five examples of infrastructure?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!