Answer:
photoshop
Explanation:
(if there are answer choices pls comment them and I'll pick an answer from them, but this is just my best guess. : )
Answer:
1. The data will not be tallying up - there will great variations and deviance.
2. There will be not enough data points
Explanation:
The management style, though it uses one manager, is not devoid of problems in the system. For example, there will be great difficulty in the collection of accurate data to properly define the system. This presents a great misinformation on the outcome of the data process. This is likely to be caused by the first factor that is the data having a lot of discrepancies. The discrepancy causes the data to be meaningless in terms of the trends displayed. In addition, the lack of enough points posses a challenge to the data collection and processing procedure. The data base management system can be used to concentrate data on a central point of reference.
looks like a rxc custom gt3 with a v6 *badass sport car*
The answer is a) It improves upon the two-phased commit by requiring that locks be acquired at the start of a transaction.
Reason: The 3PC is an extension or you can say developed from 2PC that avoids blocking of an operation. It just ensures that first n sites have intended to commit a transaction that means it acquires commits or locks before the start of any transaction to avoid any blocking.
Option b) is wrong as it does not allow coordination, it just let all the other sites do their transaction if any other site is blocked, so no coordination is there between sites that they will wait till their coordinator is corrected.
Option c) is wrong as lock operations are shared between other connections as when their coordinator fails, the new coordinator agrees to the old coordinator that they had shared locks before and they can start their transaction.
Option d) is wrong as option a) is correct.
If you like the answer, please upvote.
Whatwhatwhatwhat???????????
