If there is an insufficient contribution margin to cover fixed expenses, there will always be an occurrence of a net loss.
<h3>What is a Contribution Margin?</h3>
The contribution margin can be expressed in gross income terms. After subtracting the variable element of the firm's expenditures, it indicates the extra money gained for each product sold.
The contribution margin is calculated by subtracting the selling price/unit from the variable cost/unit.
This metric displays how much a certain product adds to the company's total earnings. It displays the share of revenue that helps to pay the firm's fixed costs and gives one approach to illustrate the profit potential of a certain product supplied by a company.
Therefore, If there is an insufficient contribution margin to cover fixed expenses, there will always be an occurrence of a net loss.
Learn more about contribution margin here:
brainly.com/question/24881206
Answer:
Decrease her price by $20
Explanation:
Please see attachment for working notes and explanation
Answer:
Substitution
Explanation:
Principle of subsitution states that no consumer should buy a product for a high price of he can get an alternative (duplicate) that is of a cheaper price.
Substitutes are alternatives that provide similar satisfaction to the customer.
When the price of one product goes up the customer has a choice of going for an alternative.
For example honey and sugar are substitutes. When the price of one goes down people will go for the cheaper alternative. This acts as a price control mechanism.
Answer:
d) raise the per-capita income
Explanation:
A less developed country is a country with a low per capita income. They usually don't have a sustainable development.
A moderately developed country is a country that has a per capita income of between $1000 - $12,000.
Per Capita income = GDP / population
I hope my answer helps you.
Answer:
C. strictly liable for Will's injuries
Explanation:
In law, Strict liability is a situation when defendant is required to be responsible to a certain situation, but can't be considered as guilty to any violation.
There are two points that need to be highlighted from the case above:
1. Astor Manufacturing process has fulfilled all of its safety regulation for storing the dangerous product.
2. The dangerous product owned by Astor Manufacturing caused William's injury.
The regulations for hazard management is created by the government, and the leak is not caused by their negligence. It's caused by unexpected natural disaster. This is why we can't say that Astor is guilty to any violation.
But still, the chemical that they created injured William. The court will most likely force Astor to be responsible for all the medical expenses incurred by william.
